How many opinions do you get before you decided on an acqablation?

Posted by albiet @albiet, Aug 14 8:03am

I had a rezum that lasted about 6 years and need things fixed . my urologist recomeneded an acquablation. I am going to see a nyc dr that does that but would anyone get a 2nd opinion if he says that its needed?

Interested in more discussions like this? Go to the Men's Health Support Group.

Profile picture for njx58 @njx58

I had aquablation and it was a home run. It's not "crude." Least chance of side effects. You want the minimal effective treatment.

Jump to this post

Thanks!!! I am collecting information about the various treatment options. I am thrilled that MAYO Arizona called me this morning to set our initial appointment -- I would see a very highly respected urologist (with an amazingly impressive resume) who is involved in very contemporary trials regarding Vapor2: a transurethral water vapor ablation of Gleason Grade Group 2 (GS 3+4) prostate cancer. Sounds great to me. I am scheduled for my biopsy on 9/9 - so I am moving forward, though maybe early to "plan" my treatment.

REPLY
Profile picture for soby @soby

What Dr. and Hosptal did you use for HoLEP?

Jump to this post

Dr Kevin Wymer at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester MN did my HOLEP surgery.

REPLY
Profile picture for shark @shark

Good luck, and let us know how your result is. I had the Rezum 4 years ago and I am now back to just as bad as ever (get up 5 times a night to urinate and it takes a long time as it is just a trickle.) I have been debating HOLEP or maybe even go for 2nd Rezum? I like the minimally invasive part of the Rezum and the low chances of sexual side effect. My prostate was 100 grams initially then Rezum took it down to about 80. Frustrating to say the least. PAE does not sound that appealling to me (intentionally causing starvation of blood to a part of your body by loading the area with small plastic pellets.) Aquablation sounds pretty crude to me as well (blasting parts of your body with high velocity H2O.) What to do.

Jump to this post

I have a larger prostate over 100 grams with a large obstructing median lobe. Three years ago I explored my options. Even then i was thinking aquablation would be the way to go but my insurance did not cover it then. I had rezum done which worked for about a year and then had a second rezum that also worked for about a year. As my symptoms recently havevreturned i was happy to learn my insurance now covers aquablation, although i will have to travel for it. I have researched it heavily and am very hopeful it will provide lasting relief for my particular situation. The “crude” aspect of aquablation you mention is likely the fluffy “cotton candy” edge it can leave, however, that can be “cleaned up” in a few minutes using the tool used when doing a turp. That tool is also used to close off two veins that in the past sometimes caused bleeding issues. It’s the only use of heat during aquablation. The latest best practices that have been adopted have largely reduced the risk of needing a transfusion following aquablation. Recent studies show aquablation can provide durable results similar to turp, holep and pvp without the potential side effects associated with using heat to remove tissue. Im thinking by the time i would need another procedure they will have come up with something even better than aquablation.

REPLY
Please sign in or register to post a reply.