Cribriform cells: Does their presence change treatment approach?
Does anyone have any insight on how cribriform presence changes approaches or treatment? Are there time constraints? Radiation suggestions that would optimize the destruction of these cribriform - is radiation therapy an option for cribriform cancer in the prostate?
Interested in more discussions like this? Go to the Prostate Cancer Support Group.
Pluvicto is starting to get a lot of attention at my local research hospital. By happenstance met a nuclear nurse from that hospital at our local mountain biking park a few weeks ago and had a long talk about it.
The good news is that Gleason 3+4 is borderline: it's the lowest score that oncologists are even willing to call prostate cancer (it's lower risk than 4+3, which is also Gleason 7).
One likely recommendation is what they call "active surveillance", which means just more-frequent blood tests and scans to keep an eye on it. If PSA hits 10 or so (depending on the oncologist), they might consider trying some medication, but I think it would be less common to jump straight to surgery or radiation with only a 3+4 score.
The other good news is that the long-term survival rate for Gleason 3+4=7 with treatment is somewhere over 99%, I think.
There are probably cancer patients who need treatment urgently being triaged ahead of your husband, so in a sense, it's good news that they're not in a rush to see him, even though the wait is stressful. For me in 2021 it was straight into a hospital bed, being wheeled back and forth on a stretcher for a few days for endless tests and imaging while they tried to figure out what was happening, rushing into the operating room in the wee hours for 10+ hours of emergency surgery, then 3 1/2 months before I was stable enough to be allowed to go back home. Trust me, you don't want to be in a situation where they're eager to take him in a hurry. 🙂
In the meantime, many people in the forum have found this book very helpful for understanding prostate cancer, including your husband's situation. It's well worth a read (even though things have already changed a bit just since it was last updated in 2023.
https://www.amazon.ca/Patrick-Walshs-Surviving-Prostate-Cancer/dp/1538726866
Thank you so much for your reply! We are seeing a top notch Urologist who specializes in prostate ca robotic surery, but we are still looking around to see if we can make it happen sooner. Wish you and your husband all the very best in this journey!
Thank you for your reply! So sorry to hear of your sad experiences. Sincerely hope all will be well going forward. Yes you are right about there being others who need the surgery more urgently than us and I do thank God that our case is not so urgent. My huband is very cool about it, atleast outwardly. Que sera sera. I am the worrying proactive one trying to find answers. In the meantime keeping my fingers crossed.
I'm doing great now, thanks! Even when you're diagnosed with de-novo advanced prostate cancer (which is far from your husband's case), the new treatment options have changed everything compared to 5–10 years ago.
Thank you for the book recommendation. I have so many tabs open on my device from different sites as I research. I hope it has some current information on intraductal cancer. My husband is by nature a non worrier and I want to know everything.
I am diagnosed with GG2 and Gleason same 3+4=7 back in March. I’m just two weeks postop from a RARP. Prior to surgery I had biopsy and 12 of 18 samples were positive. The good news is the borders were clean. The bad news is my morphology are large cribiform pattern 4 and an atypical intraductal proliferation of suspicious nature.
So my provider remarked that this was the best case scenario choosing surgery as my biopsy showed the intraductal but not cribiform. So often PSA’s for a year minimum. My decision was removal, and after finding cribiform I’m convinced as well as my surgeon that if I watched this my outcome would not as good.
Michael Lyons, MBA, BSN, RN
I will look for the studies. There have been a number of them. I have 4+3 with cribiform.
I had SBRT without adt.
Cribiform still isn’t fully understood. We know it is more aggressive but how much more is depends on a number of factors.
-no IDC
- no hypoxia in tumor
- basal immune subtype of tumor
- no PTEN loss
The PTEN and IDC were the biggest factors. PTEN loss amplifier of aggressiveness
I’m not a doctor, but as they say
“no two cancers are alike”.
I was fortunate to have an oncologist dig into my case as an individual.
I have read about this and this part was quite informative
SBRT is an excellent option for most localized prostate cancers, but for tumors with a cribriform pattern, the risk of recurrence is higher and SBRT may not fully eliminate the cancer. These cases often require more aggressive or combined treatment approaches, and decisions should be made in consultation with a specialist. As a result surgery is recommended for localized cancer.
EBRT is also recommended with a little bit higher dosage than without cribriform.
Hi, based on the research I have done for my prostate cancer diagnosis, I think your Urologist is giving you good advice. With a Gleason score of 3+4 and cancer that is contained to the prostate, active surveillance could be one of the options available. I don't say this to suggest this treatment option, but rather to indicate that from the information you have provided, his form of cancer is not aggressive and not likely to progress significantly in six months or likely even longer.
I am also from Canada (central Alberta). Before having a biopsy, I had a PSMA MRI, which detected a small lesion that extended outside the capsule of the prostate. A subsequent biopsy confirmed that the lesion was cancerous (Gleason 4+3) with Cribriform Pattern 4 present. I had a subsequent PSMA PET Scan that showed no indication of spread. Because my cancer had more aggressive indicators than your husbands (i.e., it extended outside of my prostate capsule, was Gleason 4+3 and had Cribriform pattern), I definitely required treatment and had a robot assisted radical prostatectomy on July 14th. My follow-up pathology showed no cancer in any of the margins of what was removed or in removed lymph nodes and seminal vesicles. This was good news and post surgery pathology is standard testing that they will do if your husband opts for surgery.
A few things to consider:
1) Check if the biopsy results mention anything about Cribriform Pattern, which is a more aggressive form. If it was not found this is a good sign.
2) If your husband had a PSMA MRI test before getting a biopsy, this provides an image of prostate and whether the cancer is confined to the prostate or may have spread to surrounding tissues. I was not sure what you meant by "Contained in both side prostate", but if you meant that the cancer is confined to the prostate this is also a good thing.
3) I did a lot of online research from reputable sites and spoke to two different urologists, but I still wasn't sure I knew enough about the treatment options to be sure that a prostatectomy was the best option for me. I decided to book private consults with a urology surgeon and a radiation oncologist at the Mayo Clinic. It cost me a few thousand dollars US, but I was able to get all of my questions answered within a couple of weeks and I am very happy I did it.
4) If your husband decides on a prostatectomy, make sure he gets a robot assisted radical prostatectomy or RARP and not an Open prostatectomy. While research may indicate that the outcomes may be similar, the recovery is much faster RARP.
5) I suggest at least checking into active surveillance as a treatment option, if only to give you comfort that your husbands cancer, based on what you posted and my understanding as a fellow patient only, is likely to progress slowly.
I empathize with you because I found the uncertainty on not being sure what to do and then not being sure when it will be done to be the hardest part.
I wish you and your husband all of the best.