← Return to Focal Cryotherapy vs RARP

Discussion

Focal Cryotherapy vs RARP

Prostate Cancer | Last Active: 7 hours ago | Replies (12)

Comment receiving replies
@bjroc

Tulsa
https://tulsaprocedure.com/find-a-tulsa-pro-center/
https://tulsaprocedure.com/
If wondering about Tulsa Pro from a science point of view, here is a basic Tulsa science overview article
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9231661/
Conclusions:
“As an alternative to conventional treatments, TULSA is safe and effective for prostate tissue ablation in men with primary PCa. There is also evidence that TULSA delivers effective relief of urinary symptoms while treating PCa in a single, low-morbidity procedure. The likelihood of freedom from additional treatment or potency preservation is associated with the planned ablation fraction.”

Jump to this post


Replies to "Tulsa https://tulsaprocedure.com/find-a-tulsa-pro-center/ https://tulsaprocedure.com/ If wondering about Tulsa Pro from a science point of view, here is..."

Thanks for sharing. I'm familiar with TULSA - Pro. Cryotherapy is approved by insurance but I don't think TULSA is. And the closest person to me who does this is a long way away. I'm at a university center of excellence with very knowledgeable and experienced doctors and trust them.