← Return to Meet others living with Head & Neck Cancer: Introduce yourself

Discussion
Comment receiving replies
@alexandra24

Thank you so much for this @sepdvm . I’m sorry that you’ve had to go through that but amazing that you are 13 years down the line with local recurrence. I get the impression from consultants that metastasis is the main problem but again that’s amazing that you’ve been able to have them dealt with.
My ACC is very near the near blood vessel and nerves going through the foramen rotundum so they wouldn’t be able to remove this bit. Therefore the thoughts are what’s the point in removing the large part sitting below this and below the skull base if this problematic part will be left. Some surgeons have said if you debulk the tumour the smaller parts will be easier to deal with for radiotherapy. Others have said that it makes no difference - radiotherapy will deal with the large tumour in the same way it will the smaller parts. So this is the bit I don’t know! The worry is the risk of surgery given the closeness to the skull base and the risk of CSF leakage. Also someone mentioned the increased risk of metastasis with surgery if it gets in the bloodstream. In my mind if less of the tumour is there there are less cancer cells to ‘wake up’ from the radiotherapy. I didn’t realise you could sensitise the tumour before radiotherapy - ACC obviously being pretty radio resistant one too. I will look in to this. Did they know they wouldn’t be able to remove your tumour with clear margins? I tried to get a telephone appointment with Mayo clinic but they only do them in person sadly.

Jump to this post


Replies to "Thank you so much for this @sepdvm . I’m sorry that you’ve had to go through..."

Clean margins were the goal, but the depth of tumor growth in cochlea area was difficult. In the end he was just grinding away bone with nothing left to check margins so final positive piece was what we had to go with. I have always felt that surgery is the first best option, but with a mass in close proximity to important structures that changes. Some treatments may cause shrinkage of the original mass so that surgery down the road may have better results. I would expect that larger volumes of tissue being irradiated could cause more side effects due to increased surface area being treated. But I'm not a radiation oncologist. When I asked the Mayo radiation oncologist if all radiation is equal, he said definitely not. He was able to recommend a well known radiation oncologist closer to home for my treatment. So asking about experience and success rate may also be important if you have choices.