← Return to Nanoknee, is it better or merely hype?

Discussion
gratefulbob avatar

Nanoknee, is it better or merely hype?

Joint Replacements | Last Active: 13 hours ago | Replies (63)

Comment receiving replies
Profile picture for imaginger @imaginger

Yes, nanoknee procedure was a LITTLE better. True I was more mobile sooner. But as I'm recovering from the right knee /Mako, the 1st (nano) knee still has issues -it still has numbness and sudden sharp pains. I hear this is very common with knee surgery recovery . Been thinking about it, it depends on how bad off the bones are to begin with and I think I had pretty arthritic joints, "bone on bone " so perhaps more bone had to be cut? it's just frustrating because it's so expensive -but I don't think it's the magical cure that they are advertising. Frankly I think it's deceptive with their advertising. It's weird that you can't find a whole lot about this procedure online in the way of other people's experience or reviews. I would be very interested to hear from other people and their experience. Thank you for asking!

Jump to this post


Replies to "Yes, nanoknee procedure was a LITTLE better. True I was more mobile sooner. But as I'm..."

thanks for your view