My Gleason score is 7 - 3+4. How long can I live without treatment?

At 3+4 there are many treatment offerings for sure . Up to you and your Dr's what is best for you. I think you said you're 70 . What did your RO( Radiation oncologist) day ? I am not a Dr , but feel you should closely monitor it . Doing nothing may NOT be a option IF you want a longer life per se . Your biopsy after operation could prove interesting too , if you went this way . God Bless Sir . Keep us informed of your case .

I'm 78 and had a Gleason score of 7 4+3 and PSA climbed to 7.5. My Dr. told me I had a 100% chance to live 5 more years doing nothing and 85% chance to live 10 more years doing nothing. But during those years how much would I suffer from spreading cancer before it took me? I chose to have the TULSA PRO procedure and relieve the worry of cancer spreading. I'm in good health and am active. If I was in ill health and unable to do the things I like doing my choice may have been to do nothing. The Dr. told me that all the cancer was ablated. The treatment was easy and painless with no anticancer medication. I return in March for PSA test and followup. I feel good about my decision and hopefully the cancer won't return.

I am 66 years old and chose Tulsa Pro in July 2024 at Mayo Clinic Rochester. Just had my six month MRI and it shows no sign of cancer. PSA dropped from 8.6 to 0.96. My radiologist says my results are excellent. As bobbygene stated, the procedure was painless and I have had zero side effects. An added benefit is I only have to get up one time a night to pee!

mayoclinicadvice23, THIS IS NOT ADVICE -- I believe that every instance of PCa is unique to that individual. But in response to what you were asking, I am sharing my unique experience.

I went approximately 20 years post-biopsy diagnosis without treatment. The initial diagnosis was 3+3 and surgery was recommended. A couple of years later, after a second biopsy, the diagnosis was 3+4, with treatment highly recommended. (I don't remember one or another treatment being particularly recommended.)

I went ~20 years from that first biopsy until I decided to have treatment, when my psa had reached 56, as I remember, after some 8 years without any PCa-oriented testing. (I can not tell you why I waited: I don't know, other than I was worried that each treatment I had been offered might too negatively affect *my individual lifestyle*.)

Again, I emphasize that this was *my individual experience*; in participating in many groups and attending numerous conferences, I have not encountered anyone else who has similarly avoided treatment.

To add to what you asked, as I imagine all readers will wonder, at -76 years old, a PSMA PET scan showed cancer in the prostate and (had advanced?) in some pelvic lymph nodes, and I started (only) ADT (though radiation treatment was also highly recommended), which after a problem and discontinuance with abiraterone, and several treatments with Lupon followed by 6 months of pause, the psa seems to be rising -- so far only somewhat, but perhaps significantly.

Best of luck to you (and to me and to all!) in whatever you decide!

Can I ask why no radiation? I just had 25 rounds at Sloan and it was nothing. The worst ( if I can even call it that!) part is figuring out the bladder and bowel prep. Side effects minimal.
Sure, maybe years out they will develop, but I might not have gotten those years without the treatment.
Being on ADT for the rest of your life - which rising PSA indicates- can possibly be even more hazardous to your health.
Not criticizing or judging your personal decisions. Mine are different, that’s all. You’ve really been quite fortunate to go 20 yrs without treatment and no one can deny that the gamble you took really paid off.
Best of luck on whatever you decide!
Phil

I don't think it's accurate to conclude only if you are on long term ADT do you risk having CV events. That may or may not be true of blood glucose issues. The image here is from the reporting on the HERO trial which was the Phase 3 randomized clinical trial comparing relugolix (aka Orgovix) to lupron. It shows % of each arm that experienced a MACE event (Major Adverse Cardiac Events) as a function of time under treatment - 0-48 weeks.

What you see is that MACE events occur at a more or less constant rate (the graphs approximate straight lines). That rate does not increase with time. The graph increases with time because it is counting cumulative events. To me that says at any arbitrary point in time under treatment with either medication, there is a constant probability of a MACE occurring. It stands to reason, though I don't think it is proven in this trial, that those experiencing MACE events early would be those patients with the most advanced CV issues going into treatment. Link to the HERO trial:
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2004325
Figure 2, Cumulative incidence of MACE:

One more try with the image...

Thank you and wish I had this prior to starting short term Lupron for 6 months. Going to ask if I can switch at my 3 month appointment and shot. Frankly I am at the point of switching Doctors. Every week something else like this pops up. Best wishes.

I don't think that is uncommon - (every week something else pops up.)

Might mention that if you download the Supplementary Appendix from the link provided in the paper there is a lot of other detailed comparison data. FYI.

Best of luck!

The "just had" is not comforting: it's the sometime after just had that I am concerned about and what prevents my doing it. BTW: that "rise", for now at least, is only to 0.08 (from < 0.05, but psa's from two different labs, and the newer one is not known to me as wholly reliable) while off of ADT for 9(?) months. And, it seems to me, I don't likely have more than five acceptably good more years left anyway, and if going back on ADT keeps things in check for those years... 😉

I've provided this link in response to a post elsewhere. It was published after I had made my decisions, so it *maybe* has confirmed my decisions rather than having influenced them:
https://www.urotoday.com/video-lectures/localized-prostate-cancer/video/4525-overtreatment-of-prostate-cancer-persists-in-men-with-limited-life-expectancy-timothy-daskivich.html