← Return to PRP injections for a torn and degenerative meniscus in left knee at 50

Discussion
Comment receiving replies
@heyjoe415

FWIW, I see PRP as an expensive and temporary fix, with results not guaranteed. If a patient's knee has degraded to this point, a TKR may be a better option.

Some people are concerned about TKR surgery. I think it has a long track record and has become even better with robotic assistance.

The patient has to do both pre-surgery and post-surgery rehab on the knee. It is time consuming and boring. Vigorous rehab goes a long way toward ensuring a good outcome. I'm 70 now, had both knees replaced in 2022 four months apart (Stryker/Mako robotic assistant used) and couldn't be happier about my knees. I spin 5x/week and can do anything in the gym EXCEPT impact exercises - so no running, BB, racquetball, jumprope. I was a marathon runner and miss that from time to time. But my running days were over long before the surgery.

Jump to this post


Replies to "FWIW, I see PRP as an expensive and temporary fix, with results not guaranteed. If a..."

PRP lasted 10 years and to some extent is still working for my daughter. I don't really consider that "temporary." It worked better than surgery for her.

Thank you for your post. I've been told that I'll eventually need TKR one both knees but the one that has less OA is the one with a degenerative medial meniscus tear. I'm 63. My Dad also had both of his knees replaced so although he was a quarterback in college with injuries then, I do believe its hereditary. Your post gives me hope because I love to spin but cannot do that right now. I'm postponing even thinking about TKR right now. Going for my second PRP injection hoping this helps.