Actemra coverage on Medicare in California?

Posted by redboat @redboat, Sep 12 11:38am

Can anyone comment on getting coverage for Actemra while on a Medicare plan, specifically in California?

I retired and at 65 am transitioning to Medicare. I am currently insured by Kaiser Permanente Northern California (KPNC). When I transition to Medicare, so far their "experts" have been unable to tell me if the KPNC Medicare Advantage plans cover Actemra.

I could also go on a Medicare supplement plan here in California, but again I am unsure which plans cover Actemra. (KPNC does not accept Medicare supplement plans, so I would need to switch medical organizations for this.)

Interested in more discussions like this? Go to the Polymyalgia Rheumatica (PMR) Support Group.

I have the same ... traditional Medicare with United HealthCare supplement Plan F or whatever one doesn't pay the first $200 Medicare deductible every year. I don't pay the $200 deductible either as long as I go to the VA.

In 2025, I'm considering switching to an Advantage Plan for veterans who get their care at the VA. Supposedly United HealthCare will pay me money to get on that Advantage Plan ... how ridiculous is that? They say since I get my medications and care from the VA that saves them a lot of money.

The VA does my Actemra infusion at no cost to me but it costs taxpayers. I pay taxes too so I figure I pay for it too somehow in the grand scheme of things. The VA can't bill Medicare for the cost of the infusion but the VA gets some reimbursement from my Medicare supplement. I'm not quite sure how it all works but everyone seems happy.

REPLY

I've learned a little about how Medicare coverage for Actemra works in California. It it probably similarly elsewhere, but some of what I write below is specialized to Kaiser Permanente Northern California (KPNC), which serves the San Francisco Bay area. Bottom line: for those on Medicare, it looks like by using KPNC's Medicare Part D plan, Actemra injections are covered and are cheaper than the alternative, Actemra infusions. This does not include the effect of support plans that have income testing.

There are two ways to get Actemra:
1) Infusion (administered at a medical center)
2) Self injections.
This matters because these two routes are paid for by different parts of Medicare, with different rates and maximums.

INFUSIONS of Actemra, which are given once a month at a medical center, are considered medical procedures and are therefore covered by Medicare Part B (the medical insurance part for things like doctor visits and outpatient care). There is a 20% copay, which I'm told ends up being about $700-$800/month. If you are at KPNC on Medicare, there are 2 plans. One has a $3900 annual out of pocket maximum, and the other has $6000. So you pay the $700-$800/month for Actemra until you hit the out of pocket maximum. Based solely on this, the plan that has a $3900 out of pocket max is cheaper, even though it has a $70/month premium and the other plan's premium is $0. The total would be $4740 for a year of Actemra. But it turns out injections are less, perhaps much less.

INJECTIONS of Actemra, which are self-administered, typically once a week or every other week, are considered drugs, and are therefore covered by Medicare Part D (the part that covers drugs). There are many suppliers of Medicare Part D, and if you sign up with KPNC for Medicare Part A&B, you can still sign up for Part D elsewhere. However, looking at the US government's Medicare.gov site, it turns out that the KPNC Part D plan is very competitive in benefits, and it does cover Actemra, and further, Part D is includes at no additional cost when you get Part A&B coverage from KPNC. There is an out of pocket maximum for the KPNC Part D plan, which I am told is about $3300 for 2024, and was scheduled to go to $3500 for 2025. However, I am told, due to new government regulations, that the out of pocket maximum is likely to be at most $2000 for 2025, and this will be true for any Part D plan offered anywhere. The details of copays on Kaiser's Part D are complex (initially a 33% copay, followed by $20% once the total drug cost to KPNC has been $5000, so after about 6 weeks for Acterma, then no copay). But you'll never pay more that the out of pocket maximum for the Part D plan, so either $3500 or $2000 for a year of Actemra in 2025, depending on when the government regulations begin to be enforced.

None of the above includes the normal monthly payments for Medicare since you will have to pay those no matter what you do, even if you don't get Actemra. The costs I've stated above are the additional costs to get Actemra.

REPLY
@redboat

I've learned a little about how Medicare coverage for Actemra works in California. It it probably similarly elsewhere, but some of what I write below is specialized to Kaiser Permanente Northern California (KPNC), which serves the San Francisco Bay area. Bottom line: for those on Medicare, it looks like by using KPNC's Medicare Part D plan, Actemra injections are covered and are cheaper than the alternative, Actemra infusions. This does not include the effect of support plans that have income testing.

There are two ways to get Actemra:
1) Infusion (administered at a medical center)
2) Self injections.
This matters because these two routes are paid for by different parts of Medicare, with different rates and maximums.

INFUSIONS of Actemra, which are given once a month at a medical center, are considered medical procedures and are therefore covered by Medicare Part B (the medical insurance part for things like doctor visits and outpatient care). There is a 20% copay, which I'm told ends up being about $700-$800/month. If you are at KPNC on Medicare, there are 2 plans. One has a $3900 annual out of pocket maximum, and the other has $6000. So you pay the $700-$800/month for Actemra until you hit the out of pocket maximum. Based solely on this, the plan that has a $3900 out of pocket max is cheaper, even though it has a $70/month premium and the other plan's premium is $0. The total would be $4740 for a year of Actemra. But it turns out injections are less, perhaps much less.

INJECTIONS of Actemra, which are self-administered, typically once a week or every other week, are considered drugs, and are therefore covered by Medicare Part D (the part that covers drugs). There are many suppliers of Medicare Part D, and if you sign up with KPNC for Medicare Part A&B, you can still sign up for Part D elsewhere. However, looking at the US government's Medicare.gov site, it turns out that the KPNC Part D plan is very competitive in benefits, and it does cover Actemra, and further, Part D is includes at no additional cost when you get Part A&B coverage from KPNC. There is an out of pocket maximum for the KPNC Part D plan, which I am told is about $3300 for 2024, and was scheduled to go to $3500 for 2025. However, I am told, due to new government regulations, that the out of pocket maximum is likely to be at most $2000 for 2025, and this will be true for any Part D plan offered anywhere. The details of copays on Kaiser's Part D are complex (initially a 33% copay, followed by $20% once the total drug cost to KPNC has been $5000, so after about 6 weeks for Acterma, then no copay). But you'll never pay more that the out of pocket maximum for the Part D plan, so either $3500 or $2000 for a year of Actemra in 2025, depending on when the government regulations begin to be enforced.

None of the above includes the normal monthly payments for Medicare since you will have to pay those no matter what you do, even if you don't get Actemra. The costs I've stated above are the additional costs to get Actemra.

Jump to this post

You have done your homework. Someone started a thread on Tyenne. Recently FDA approved and much cheaper. Although it would probably still hit the out of pocket maximum.

REPLY

@redboat
Hello red boat!
I have Kaiser Senior Advantage in Southern California which is a medicare/Kaiser plan.
My rheumatologist wants to start me on Actemra soon. I’m assuming this is no problem with medicare! If I find out differently I will let you know.

REPLY
@tuckerp

You have done your homework. Someone started a thread on Tyenne. Recently FDA approved and much cheaper. Although it would probably still hit the out of pocket maximum.

Jump to this post

@redboat
My doctor did talk about taking the injections of Actemra, not the infusion. The cost is probably why— I appreciate all the research you did in regards to this! Looks like I will be getting the injections, but I will check to see if it is different for Southern California Kaiser. I also was a Kaiser employee for 20 years under a union contract which negotiated co-pays for drugs, etc so this might factor into my particular coverage. I know I have the same co-pays I had when I was working.

REPLY
@jlo2252

@redboat
Hello red boat!
I have Kaiser Senior Advantage in Southern California which is a medicare/Kaiser plan.
My rheumatologist wants to start me on Actemra soon. I’m assuming this is no problem with medicare! If I find out differently I will let you know.

Jump to this post

@redboat has an incredible story about how high his inflammation markers were. I'm not sure about how he was diagnosed with PMR but it was considered to be an extreme case. His response to Actemra was remarkable and as far as I know he is off prednisone and symptom free now.

REPLY
@dadcue

It basically says the same thing I was trying to explain. I know very little about this stuff but I sometimes needed to submit information when a patient's insurance didn't want to pay for things.

The thing I'm not sure about is if Mayo accepts Medicare reimbursement rates or not. Someone told me once that Mayo doesn't.

I know Mayo does a lot of tests and "extensive work-ups" which is good. However, Medicare insurance might not pay for all the tests and procedures.

Many tests and medical procedures aren't considered to be what is "usual and customary" in insurance lingo for the condition being treated. This is where "prior-authorization" comes into play because insurance companies say much of what medical providers do isn't necessary.

This is also where FDA approval for Actemra to treat GCA and Kevzara to treat PMR is so important. These medications are no longer considered to be "experimental treatments" for these conditions which is the usual reason why insurance companies don't cover the cost of certain medications.

Now medical insurance companies might say less expensive alternatives are equally effective and need to be tried first. For example, if methotrexate doesn't work maybe the insurance company will pay for a biologic. That is just another excuse if you ask me. I think insurance companies would prefer people to be treated with prednisone. Many patients think prednisone is the "only medication that works" for PMR/GCA but this is starting to change.

Jump to this post

@dadcue
My head is spinning from all the information I’m getting, lol 😂
The only thing I can say is that so far I’m happy with the coverage I have!!
Thanks for all your info!

REPLY
@dadcue

"I believe that yearly part D drug costs will be capped at $2000 starting next year."

I hope this is the patient's "out of pocket cost" will be capped at $2,000 per year.

I once proposed the idea that the number of medications a patient could have should be capped at a 5 medication limit and no more than 5. It would be the patient's decision to decide which medications worked the best for them. If a new one came along that exceeded a 5 medication limit they would need to stop one before starting the new one. I thought things would be simpler that way. I said it as a joke but I think some people thought it was a serious proposal.

After I was diagnosed with PMR and started on prednisone, my medication list exploded to over ten medications. Some people said I was over my limit. After I started Actemra and discontinued prednisone my medication list went back down to 2 medications not counting my Actemra infusion. I said my Actemra infusion shouldn't be counted since my Actemra infusion was administered in a hospital setting. An infusion given in a "hospital setting" wasn't considered to be an outpatient prescription medication according to Medicare. This is true even though I go to the hospital to get the infusion for an hour and I go home after every infusion.

The whole problem with medication costs is about who is going to pay for them.

Sometimes I think people wouldn't need so many medications if they were only prescribed just a few that worked well and only the medications which didn't cause so many side effects.

Jump to this post

@dadcue
I would be in big trouble if they capped benefits with only 5 medications! 😂

REPLY
@jlo2252

@dadcue
I would be in big trouble if they capped benefits with only 5 medications! 😂

Jump to this post

Sometimes I don't know how much of a benefit there is to take many medications. My view point comes from having to give medications to patients every morning. I would need to carefully get their medications ready for them every day. They were very sick people so they might need to take 20 or more medications first thing every morning. I just wasn't sure all the medications were helping that much. Sometimes I felt like I was contributing to their demise by expecting people to take so many medications.

Actemra is the one medications that seems to do me a lot of good. I am back down to taking 2 medications now not counting Actemra. My remaining medications are "as needed" or for "prevention" or totally optional.

There were so many people that had no idea what medications they took. All they knew was a doctor told them they needed the medication but they didn't know why. The 5 medication limit was more about putting a limit on doctors from prescribing so many medications.

When I was diagnosed with PMR and "other things" I was in the same boat for a long time. Many of my medications were prescribed to me to treat Prednisone side effects. I was giving myself more than 10 medications and I wasn't so sure all my medications were doing that much good.

REPLY
@jlo2252

@redboat
Hello red boat!
I have Kaiser Senior Advantage in Southern California which is a medicare/Kaiser plan.
My rheumatologist wants to start me on Actemra soon. I’m assuming this is no problem with medicare! If I find out differently I will let you know.

Jump to this post

Thanks @jlo2252 ! Assuming Kaiser Senior Advantage in Southern California is like Northern California's, Actemra should be covered. In NorCal, Medicare Part D coverage, which is needed to offset costs for Actemra, is included at no extra cost at Kaiser. There is a new alternative, called Tyenne, which I understand less expensive. But Tyenne and Actemra are both quite expensive. Without insurance or any offsets, Actemra is something like $40,000/year.

REPLY
Please sign in or register to post a reply.