← Return to Gleason7(3+4) - treatment options recommendation
DiscussionGleason7(3+4) - treatment options recommendation
Prostate Cancer | Last Active: Oct 7 1:02pm | Replies (237)Comment receiving replies
Replies to "Thanks Sir . I have talked to some Operation guys that have had 0.008 ( bottom..."
Very nice description of your life in beautiful Victoria!
Regarding: " but most have a trace after surgery , you are right . "
Last week my surgeon explained why my first post-surgery PSA of 0.009 was not "undetectable" as I thought. He said that when the surgeon separates the prostate tissue from the bladder neck, the prostate tissue is "torn away" from the bladder neck and some of the BENIGN prostate cells remain behind on the bladder neck. (In my case, the cancer was not near the bladder neck) These benign cells naturally generate a small trace of PSA. My next PSA test will be in three months and if that PSA remains at or near 0.009 that will be my unique baseline against which future bi-annual PSA tests which be compared.
But if my PSA level has risen significantly higher than the 0.009, that would indicate that prostate cancer cells remain somewhere in my body and further diagnostics and treatments would be considered.
His explanation made such perfect sense, I thought I'd share it with the brethren.
Best of luck on your journey(s).
Well PSA is one of the indicator for early detection like in my case. That’s how I ended up learning about the situation. It kept bouncing up and down over last 2 years but this year it was 5.14 and my pcp suggested for urology visit. As there is no symptom, I was reasonably sure that even if I do mri for this analysis I should be okay. That’s how I discovered this. Thanks you Mayo Clinic higher standards and advanced equipments.
Now I will be evaluating all options while I scheduled for surgery Oct 30