← Return to Post Cataract : posterior capsular opacification - speed

Discussion
Comment receiving replies
@elliott1953

My surgeon did not use an eye piece. I would have felt better if he had since even with my eyes dilated my pupils are on the small size. It was about a minute or two per eye. No discomfort during or afterwards.

As mentioned, I am disappointed about the rotating starbursts which I didn't have before but the long thicker maddox rod line is gone, and I think I will adapt to these starbursts if they are in fact permanent which I anticipate.

Regarding the macula pucker, I get relatively frequent retina checks because of my history with tears and had never been told I had a macular pucker before so whether the cataract surgery contributed to its development or its so mild that it was overlooked, I will never know. It's rather irrelevant and certainly age, past retinal issues, laser surgery etc can all be factors in its development. I read that about 20% of people 75 and older have a macular pucker and for most it won't require a significant visual consequence leading to surgery so I hope I fall in that camp.

Jump to this post


Replies to "My surgeon did not use an eye piece. I would have felt better if he had..."

I forgot to add to my note above and to answer your question. Yes, the Yag on my right eye did get my vision back to where it should be. I assume it's back to 20/20. Also, I think you may be correct in that people like us that do develop maddox rod and, who like me, were quite myopic, may be more prone to having some of these residual light streaming effects. Despite how good cataract surgery has become, it's hard to duplicate G-d's handiwork. I also understand that the implanted lens is smaller than the natural lens that was removed at least that's what I was told in my case....so I think a perfect result may be an ideal but not achievable for many