CLL - newly diagnosed
My doctor discovered smudge cells as a pre-cursor to CLL in Dec. 2015. This spring of 2016, my lyphmocyte count put over the 5000 threshold wherein I now have CLL. I am 68.
I am blessed that this is a CHRONIC versus an ACUTE cancer.
That said, I am aware that I will ultimately require some form of treatment.
It appears from the information that I have read that the forms of treatment are:
1. CHEMOTHERAPY;
2. IMBRUVICA (IMBRUTINIB)
3. IMMUNOTHERAPY
I am somewhat reluctant to consider chemotherapy.
I would be interested in hearing from CLL patients who have been exposed to EITHER IMBRUVICA or, IMMUNOTHERAPY........the success, failure, side effects etc.
Thank you so much for taking the time to respond.
Interested in more discussions like this? Go to the Blood Cancers & Disorders Support Group.
Welcome to Connect, @lancaster1963. CLL is generally a slowly developing type of leukemia and from my understanding remains one of the more treatable forms of the disease. Some patients can go for years without any treatment. You’ll learn more with your specialist visit in August after review of your tests. They’ll be able to determine the stage of your disease and whether or not treatment will be necessary at this time. Early treatment has been shown not to be any more effective than waiting until necessary.
I don’t know what the charges would be for a 2nd opinion at Mayo but I can give you the information so you can potentially find out. Both Mayo and MD Anderson are top tier cancer centers so you can’t go wrong with either. Of course, being a hematology patient at Mayo-Rochester I might be a teeny bit biased. 😉
Here is a link to get you started with Mayo. http://mayocl.in/1mtmR63
By opening that link you’ll see the numbers for each Mayo Clinic. You can select your preferred location such as Rochester, MN Jacksonville, FL. Or Phoenix, AZ.
But as you said, you may be jumping too far ahead on this. It’s better to wait until you get all of the facts from your specialist. Were you having symptoms that led to your diagnosis or was this with a routine physical?
Just to clarify, your subject title for the post says "CLL" whereas the text body says "CIL" twice, so I'm not sure which you meant.
MD Anderson recently summarized the results of a trial conducted from 2017-2021 in this article:
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41591-023-02785-8
CLL was one of the disease cohorts they treated, and they got some pretty promising results.
The study used stem cells from donated umbilical cord blood to produce a large batch of "NK" (Natural Killer) cells that were modified and infused in the patient to target the cancer cells. NK cells offer a few advantages over T cells in certain situations.
If CLL is actually your condition and you have access to MD Anderson, definitely ask them about this specific treatment.
Best wishes to you!
lancaster1963:
A few suggestions:
1. Don’t be in a hurry to get treatment. Seek a second opinion as CLL is generally a very slow growing and non-aggressive cancer. Some people never need treatment, and some don’t need treatment for many years. You may outlive it. The standard of care is the watch and wait approach where your doctor will monitor patients signs and symptoms with frequent labwork, imaging, genetic and immune testing. If your doctor and you both feel it’s time to treat then look at treatment options other than chemo.
2. Chemo is more affordable to government run health care programs like Canada’s than the more costly but more effective targeted and immunotherapies offered today, but chemo often comes with a higher toxicity profile and can be less effective.
3. If you seek treatment outside Canada you may not get reimbursed for treatment in the U.S.
4. I have SLL (same as CLL but predominantly in the lymph system vs. blood) for many years and declined to the point that my oncologist recommended treatment. I started oral Venetoclax (Venclexta), a BCL2 inhibitor, plus infusions of Obinutuzumab (Gazyva), a CD20 inhibitor, immunotherapy and targeted therapy two months ago and my bloodwork and all my symptoms dramatically improved within the first two weeks. This therapy has the highest rate of deep remission and lower levels of residual disease for CLL/SLL according to my oncologist. Other doctors may argue that point.
5. If you seek treatment in the U.S., you are facing a huge cash outlay. Venclexta will run $12,000 USD the first month and $12,000 to $18,000 USD for the following 11 months for a total of $150,000 to $200,000 USD. Gazyva runs $40,000 USD per infusion x 8 infusions = $320,000 total. On top of that, frequents follow-up labs and doctor visits are required which adds more cost. I’m well insured, so I’m OK, but I couldn’t pay all this out-of-pocket.
6. All said, you’re looking a a full year of treatment and follow-ups, so your winter in Texas may be a year instead. Ask your doctor why they won’t offer you targeted and immunotherapy?
Good luck.
My experience at a big Ontario Cancer Centre is that they've never suggested chemo for my stage 4b prostate cancer, even though my meds cost above CA $6,000/month.
As far as I know, provincial health plans can't penalise doctors for recommending more-expensive treatments *or* reward them for saving money — they all bill the same — so I'm not sure what their motivation would be to push a patient towards a cheaper treatment if a better one is available.
Access to a specific drug, or its pricing to the patient, likely depends on if the drug is in the drug formulary in the first place and what tier level it is in.
I had to switch Medicare Part D (drug) plans here in the U.S. to get my cancer drugs covered as my old plan didn’t include Venclexta or Gazyva. If I hadn't switched plans I likely would have to resort to chemo that is covered or pay for Venclexta or Gazyva out-of-pocket. These are both tier 5 drugs.
The side effects continue. As long as possible my husband says he’ll deal with them. At some point we will have to face chemo. Doc says we will have a decent runway on that option. We are just trying to deal with the intestinal issue, fatigue, and splitting fingernails. Helps to know we are not alone.
Yes, you're right about the formulary, of course. I was just saying that if an expensive medication *is* available and accessible (mine is in the Ontario formulary), doctors here have no personal financial incentive to steer you away from it.
You’re not alone here in Connect. There are so many of us who have a history with blood cancers and disorders. We’re all here to help and support each other.
I know your husband’s goal is to avoid chemo. Quite honestly, I’m not sure it’s any worse than the on-going symptoms he’s experiencing from the meds he’s taking now. I had many rounds of intense chemotherapy for an aggressive form of leukemia. There were side effects but not lingering daily such as your husband is enduring. I often think the term Chemo instills this instant fear in our minds. But it can be a life saver. So if the time comes where you husband will require a different treatment, I hope you can relax a little and not fear the term. There are many forms of chemo and he may find it isn’t so bad after all. ☺️
That was beautiful! That helped me! Thank you !
Hey ! That is awesome ! I can understand why your sister refuses! It could change things and we aren't ready for that ! I was the same
Way when I got my mammogram and my axillary nodes were enlarged and I told them what it was from but they were like hmm no, so I put the biopsy off for a month or so. And it turned out to be SLL. Now back to watch and worry with an appt tomorrow 😔. So I had CLL, now SLL