Tulsa Pro - my initial treatment experience

Posted by bjroc @bjroc, Nov 28, 2023

I want to thank all for support on my recent prostate cancer treatment, Tulsa pro. I am very thankful to my wife and my daughter who helped out lots with support. I am thankful to Mayo for finally finding the extent of the problem with a transperineal biopsy. I am also very thankful to Dr Scionti in Sarasota for being a true expert for the Tulsa procedure. Tulsa leaves everything intact except for the prostate cancer tissue plus some tissue as a safety margin near it. It goes nowhere near sphincters and nerves. I was very glad to not have any extra prostatic cancer, or cancer in seminal vesicles, ducts, nerves etc. I did have PSMA scan showing this. We will just have to see if everything works out in the long run cancer wise.

What I had cancer wise
Originally in 2021 I had a small spot seen in transition zone. It got some 3+3 more toward back where they could reach via trans rectal biopsy (done at a local university), but they could not reach the anterior where most of it was in 2021. My 2023 Mayo done transperineal biopsy had one needle at the anterior transition zone with all Gleason 4, it was not a big spot (0.2 mm caught in needle). Keep in mind in 2021 further to back it had just Gleason 3. I am not going to get caught up in Gleason scores, I know what was sampled in past, and though one needle had 4 in the front/top of anterior it was just a tiny spot in this tumor and most toward posterior was not hit here in 2023. There was also a small 3+4 on one side seen now in 2023. My PSA headed up steadily during the 2.75 years on surveillance. My final prostate size before any treatment was 110 cc, and final PSA around 16.

What worked on biopsy, and what did not.
2021: Trans rectal in 2021 biopsy did not sample well, missed most of what is in anterior transition zone and one of my problem areas. But since then, I have had plenty of time to read on things like Tulsa pro, radiation types, and so on. So was glad to have the time.
2023: Mayo Transperineally done biopsy caught the problems.

Some things I learned about MRI
What I learned is that, for me at least, diffusion weighted MRI shows very clearly what docs need to see to treat. Regular contrast enhanced MRI left my doctors not that sure, sometimes even confused. Diffusion weighted MRI to me was crystal clear where things were and what needed to be treated. Only Dr Scionti seemed geared up for diffusion weighted MRI. That includes other places I asked for initial consult, and Mayo that I went to for a while – all geared up for contrast enhanced MRI only really seemed like.

Who does new kinds of treatments.
Mayo is top notch for advanced cancers that have spread, but I learned they are just starting out with other new treatments like Tulsa Pro. I liked Mayo’s proton as a possibility, but they have filled many slots for it, and sometimes it is hard to get through insurance from what they said to me. They also do everything under protocols, they have to develop those for these new treatments of any kind since everyone looks at Mayo. So in some ways they are behind a bit, having to do everything with a protocol instead of just looking out for what is best for one individual patient. Thus, I found I had to call around if I wanted anything new. Some places are better than others seemed like to me at calling places. The best I heard from was Dr Scionti in Sarasota.

Before Tulsa for me
Because the size of my prostate was large, and one needle had all Gl 4, we did bicalutamide and dutasteride for several months. They want that temperature up during Tulsa at the top so while I still met the Tulsa size limits we shrunk things a bit to be sure.

Travel
I had to travel to Sarasota, about a 22 hour drive for me. Found a nice Airbnb down there not too far away. I drove since date of coming back was uncertain. I wanted his office to take catheter out, others might fly and self remove catheter I understand, but I was unsure about that. It is good I rented an Airbnb for more than two weeks is all I can say.

Tulsa procedure
Obviously asleep, seemed to go well. They took out about 2/3 of the prostate tissue with the Tulsa pro. The before and after MRI done while asleep clearly shows the tumors on diffusion weighted MRI, and post procedure MRI with contrast show those same areas treated well and no longer there. Woke up with the bladder spasms a real lot, oxybutynin seemed to really help but it was hard to wake up with Foley catheter and the spasms. Next day the spasms were gone, but it was tough to sit. For ten days with Foley catheter, I watched old Dr Who, movies, and obviously just sleeping. A restful period is the best help, not having to do much was important for me at least. Foley catheter for ten days was no fun but it wasn’t as hard as I imagined perhaps.

Post catheter
Was a bit tough, I still had some inflammation perhaps worse than some get, plus there is scar tissue for up to 6 months, so it was hard to pee. Alpha blocker was a must just to pee. Another couple weeks brings me to now at this writing and it is a lot easier to pee. But it was a hard travel back. I suggest stay in an Airbnb for some time post procedure plus give plenty of time after catheter is out.

Future
We will see if this all worked on the cancer over next year or two, and on after that. Hoping for no recurrence of course.

Interested in more discussions like this? Go to the Prostate Cancer Support Group.

@birchpond

Hi. New to group. I was diagnosed with PC in January after PSA test, MRI and biopsy. Gleason score is 7 3+4 with prostate size of 58 ml and a current PSA of 11. No cancer evident outside of prostate. I am a healthy 76 years, and am not wanting to do surgery, radiation or hormone treatment.

I am interested in TULSA PRO, and want to know if anyone has been treated at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, MN? If so, what was your experience? Was it hard to get approved, long wait time for procedure, did Medicare cover all or part of the cost? Thanks

Jump to this post

I went to Mayo for two years before they had Tulsa and while on active surveillance, and when I had to be treated after biopsy, they were just thinking of ordering the Tulsa though they got it pretty quick. They are all setup now. I can't answer any of your questions. All I can tell you is you do not need a referral to get into Mayo, just call the department and ask to be setup with a full set of appointments (urology, interventional radiology, etc). I think you might have to go to interventional radiology at Mayo, look up Dr Woodrum on this one. Also see above post by @mrdennyb

Scroll all the way down on this link below to see providers at Mayo you might get setup to see:
https://tulsaprocedure.com/providers/mayo-clinic-minnesota/

REPLY
@paulcalif

I had a video consultation with
UCLA Dr. Raman that does the Tulsa procedure. If it's decided that I should get treated, I am a good candidate for the Tulsa procedure. Dr. Raman describes protate cancer as "minnows" and "sharks" where minnows are not an immediate threat but sharks are. To help determine the aggressiveness of my particular cancer, he is ordering a "decipher" test. This is done using the cells already removed during my biopsy. The Dr. also wants me to consult with 2 other UCLA Dr's. a urologist and a radiologist. My next consultation will be May 5th. with a radiologist. The following consultation isn't until the end of June. Dr. Raman feels that I can wait until after the 1st. of the year which is good and bad. It's good because I think the Tulsa procedure will be covered by Medical next year. The downside is that I've switched to original medicare at a cost of $450 a month and was planning on switching back to an advantage plan during open enrollment this year. Now I'll need to stay on original medicare until open enrollment after I have the procedure done. That means Jan 2026. So, that's a little less than $10k but still a lot better than $35k. Another thing the Dr. mentioned was that they were are finding from study results, some early patients receiving Tulsa had to have follow up procedures because the initial treatment wasn't aggressive enough. So, they started getting more aggressive but are now seeing an uptick in side effects. Both the need for additional treatments and side effects are still much lower than other procedures. One last point that the Dr. made is that not treating "minnows" has the same eventual outcome as treating patients that have "minnow" level cancer. He stressed that there is no perfect way to determine whether the cancer will metastasize or not, but there are good odds given all of the various tests available today. For all of you Tulsa patients, please keep posting.

Jump to this post

Paul,

Looks like you are on a good path for a good treatment. I wish you a good speedy recovery after the procedure.

Do you have any measurement from Dr. Raman what is the cut off of 'minnow' level, and a 'shark' level?

Also, did you ask Dr Raman, how many Tulsa Pro procedures he personally has done and what is his success rate?

REPLY
@frank1956

Paul,

Looks like you are on a good path for a good treatment. I wish you a good speedy recovery after the procedure.

Do you have any measurement from Dr. Raman what is the cut off of 'minnow' level, and a 'shark' level?

Also, did you ask Dr Raman, how many Tulsa Pro procedures he personally has done and what is his success rate?

Jump to this post

I did ask those questions but didn't get clear answers. He wasnt trying to evade the questions, we just went over a lot of information. I do know that Dr. Raman is one of the pioneers with the procedure, and has spearheaded several studies. I'm currently waiting on the decipher results, should be about 2 weeks. As far as minnows and sharks, that determination is based on all of the test results that we are all familiar with. I'm consulting with a UCLA oncologist/radiologist tomorrow and a UCLA urologist in late June for 2nd. opinions. You can bet that I will have clear answers to all of my questions before under going any procedures.
Thanks for the reply!

REPLY
@birchpond

Hi. New to group. I was diagnosed with PC in January after PSA test, MRI and biopsy. Gleason score is 7 3+4 with prostate size of 58 ml and a current PSA of 11. No cancer evident outside of prostate. I am a healthy 76 years, and am not wanting to do surgery, radiation or hormone treatment.

I am interested in TULSA PRO, and want to know if anyone has been treated at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, MN? If so, what was your experience? Was it hard to get approved, long wait time for procedure, did Medicare cover all or part of the cost? Thanks

Jump to this post

Welcome, @birchpond. If you would like to request an appointment at Mayo Clinic, you can start here: http://mayocl.in/1mtmR63

With regards to your question about coverage, you can contact Mayo Clinic insurance https://www.mayoclinic.org/patient-visitor-guide/billing-insurance/contact-us

There are several members, including @mrdennyb @bjroc, who have doctored at Mayo Clinic in Rochester, MN and may be able to answer your questions too.

REPLY

Hello. I underwent the Tulsa-Pro procedure on April 8th of this year (2024). Prior to the surgery I was struggling to urinate and was having to get up every 15-20 minutes during the night (ended up with a double hernia operation as a result of the struggle to urinate). Had the foley catheter removed on May 6th without any complications. It is now extremely easy to pee, however I am still getting up at night about every hour to an hour and a half to pee (and then I fall back into a heavy sleep). No dribbling or incontinence! About 3 weeks after my procedure, my scrotum swelled to about twice it's size and is still swollen. An utrasound showed no blood clots or anything to be concerned with. Was told that the swelling should subside within 2 weeks, but so far it is not the case. Still looking forward to the swelling to subside......

REPLY
@terralhenderson

Hello. I underwent the Tulsa-Pro procedure on April 8th of this year (2024). Prior to the surgery I was struggling to urinate and was having to get up every 15-20 minutes during the night (ended up with a double hernia operation as a result of the struggle to urinate). Had the foley catheter removed on May 6th without any complications. It is now extremely easy to pee, however I am still getting up at night about every hour to an hour and a half to pee (and then I fall back into a heavy sleep). No dribbling or incontinence! About 3 weeks after my procedure, my scrotum swelled to about twice it's size and is still swollen. An utrasound showed no blood clots or anything to be concerned with. Was told that the swelling should subside within 2 weeks, but so far it is not the case. Still looking forward to the swelling to subside......

Jump to this post

I would think they would say take a anti-inflammatory or ice it or something. If nothing else Boswellia serrata might be helpful, not sure of course. Not exactly sure what is going on but hope things start improving for you somehow or another.

REPLY
@bjroc

I would think they would say take a anti-inflammatory or ice it or something. If nothing else Boswellia serrata might be helpful, not sure of course. Not exactly sure what is going on but hope things start improving for you somehow or another.

Jump to this post

Thanks for the response. I have tried icing and am taking anti-inflammatories which help to lesson the uncomfortable feeling, but do nothing to reduce the swelling. I will try the Boswellia serrata. Thanks for the tip.

REPLY

Just update everyone my PSA is still persisting and is now at 4 at 6 months post Tulsa, up from 3 at 3 months. I find it concerning, though my PSA before Tulsa was over 16. Doctor not yet concerned. I really had tons of BPH, so hard to say what it is supposed to be due to that. I pray that things are working out is all I can do.

REPLY

I am 79 in June and had Tulsa Pro procedure on April 10th. I had similar experience to above, little issue with urination, a swelling which is subsiding and overall, very little concerning pain or function issues.

REPLY
@mrdennyb

I am 79 in June and had Tulsa Pro procedure on April 10th. I had similar experience to above, little issue with urination, a swelling which is subsiding and overall, very little concerning pain or function issues.

Jump to this post

So, evidently the reduction in swelling, as in your case, can take quite a bit longer then what is stated in some medical articles that I have read. Thanks for the feed back.

REPLY
Please sign in or register to post a reply.