2 year struggle to get off prednisone still hard to get from 3 to 2mg

Posted by victoriab @victoriab, May 1 4:33pm

Was started on 20mg prednisone for PMR May 2022 significant pain relief but within. Few weeks awful insomnia and had a week of quite manic behaviour
Then breathlessness increased heart rate loss of muscle strength and low energy gp first thought I had long Covid after 7 months musculoskeletal physician said I had all the side effects of prednisone then seen by rheumatology service in public health beginning of 2023 who confirmed this and told had to persevere to lower dose I work as a social worker in mental health every time I reduced had to take time off work overwhelming fatigue nausea headache and pain it has taken me 22 months to get to 3mg my face is back to normal not so many headaches and less nausea but still fatigue and discomfort now trying 2mg alternating with 3mg to get down to 2 and then down to 1 and then none I had no idea this happened and have recently found this support group which has been helpful I long for the day I am off it Victoria B

Interested in more discussions like this? Go to the Polymyalgia Rheumatica (PMR) Support Group.

Thanks for your response prednisone certainly relieved the pain but the side effects were intolerable, where I live in Aotearoa New Zealand I wasn't offered an alternative and our primary care doctors are only allowed to prescribe prednisone all other drugs require a specialist, unfortunately none of them offered me an alternative but a physician friend said you can swap over to hydrocortisone from prednisone once you are down to 5 mg prednisone and it is apparently more tolerable but by the time my primary care doctor and I found this out I was down to 3 mg and prepared to persevere and have just gone down to 2mg the withdrawal symptoms aren't as bad as they used to be. I am really pleased the treatment your rheumatologist suggested is working well for you. Victoria B

REPLY
@victoriab

Thanks for your response prednisone certainly relieved the pain but the side effects were intolerable, where I live in Aotearoa New Zealand I wasn't offered an alternative and our primary care doctors are only allowed to prescribe prednisone all other drugs require a specialist, unfortunately none of them offered me an alternative but a physician friend said you can swap over to hydrocortisone from prednisone once you are down to 5 mg prednisone and it is apparently more tolerable but by the time my primary care doctor and I found this out I was down to 3 mg and prepared to persevere and have just gone down to 2mg the withdrawal symptoms aren't as bad as they used to be. I am really pleased the treatment your rheumatologist suggested is working well for you. Victoria B

Jump to this post

Hydrocortisone was the suggestion I received when I got to 3 mg. It was just a suggestion and my endocrinologist said it would be okay to stay on prednisone if I wished.

I want to commend you for persevering. It was extremely difficult for me at those lower doses. I was so tempted to increase my prednisone dose when I was encouraged to do so. My endocrinologist supported me and said I could increase my dose if I 'felt the need.' She wanted to know about it preferably before I increased but she didn't require that I notify her first.

I hope you are getting the support you need. I had the advantage of being on an alternative medication that wasn't suppressing my adrenal function. That allowed me to taper off prednisone more easily but it was still extremely difficult.

REPLY
@dadcue

Hydrocortisone was the suggestion I received when I got to 3 mg. It was just a suggestion and my endocrinologist said it would be okay to stay on prednisone if I wished.

I want to commend you for persevering. It was extremely difficult for me at those lower doses. I was so tempted to increase my prednisone dose when I was encouraged to do so. My endocrinologist supported me and said I could increase my dose if I 'felt the need.' She wanted to know about it preferably before I increased but she didn't require that I notify her first.

I hope you are getting the support you need. I had the advantage of being on an alternative medication that wasn't suppressing my adrenal function. That allowed me to taper off prednisone more easily but it was still extremely difficult.

Jump to this post

Thank you for your kind reply, I have coped quite well going from 3 to 2 mg so decided to just persevere hard to believe it is 2 years since I started it, I work in mental health and it was interesting that I saw a handful of patients over that time who were on prednisone for different reasons and struggling and because of my experience I was able to give them some support I otherwise wouldn't have been able to, I have been surprised by the lack of information about side effects and withdrawal symptoms and Mayo connect has been helpful in knowing that my experience isn't unusual. Victoria B

REPLY
@dadcue

There is an abundance of 'trial and error' when treating any medical condition. No two people are the same so what works for one may not work for someone else.

I don't know for sure if I'm "PMR free" or not. I have been "prednisone free" for almost three years. I still take the biologic and I'm "relatively pain free" and "PMR condition free" until the biologic is stopped. According to my rheumatologist, PMR goes into remission and the pain is relieved but my PMR condition still exists. He thinks my immune system has been attacking me for a very long time. A characteristic of the adaptive immune system is to "remember" what it attacks. My rheumatologist doesn't think my immune system will "forget" anytime soon what it has been attacking for many years.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4067599/
I wish someone would debunk this idea for me.

Prednisone never helped my overall condition but it did quickly relieve much of the pain. That is how Prednisone is deceptive because it doesn't change the overall course of the condition if you need to wait for PMR to "burn itself out."

My rheumatologist is reluctant to stop the biologic again because my condition worsens. I wouldn't say I have PMR relapses but my condition deteriorates and I need to go back on prednisone again temporarily. When the biologic is restarted it takes time to work. There isn't the immediate gratification of pain relief like prednisone provides which is deceiving in my opinion. People are not well if they need to take prednisone every day! Symptomatic relief and waiting for the PMR condition to burn itself out is not good enough. The waiting and the long term side effects from prednisone is a recipe for disaster in my opinion.

The biologic takes a few weeks to work. I currently do a monthly infusion which is nice because I don't worry anymore about how much prednisone to take each and every day. That is what "prednisone free' means to me. I don't want to take long term prednisone again but I will if it is necessary for a short period of time. My slow motion relapses don't happen instantly like when my prednisone dose got too low which often happened overnight. I don't feel like the biologic fails when it is stopped. When my condition deteriorates and the pain becomes more than I can tolerate, prednisone is restarted. I only take 15-20 mg of prednisone for a short period of time. Fortunately my condition dramatically improves again when the biologic is restarted. I then taper off prednisone again in a couple of weeks. This was a 'trial and error' approach to see if the biologic could be stopped. However, one interruption was a supply chain problem during Covid when the biologic was not available. The biologic can easily be stopped unlike prednisone when people become dependent on it.
https://www.medicinenet.com/steroid_withdrawal/article.htm
My rheumatologist had two goals when he sought approval for the biologic. The way the request was was worded --- "all other alternatives failed" (notably methotrexate and leflunomide and a few other steroid sparing medications) AND "inability to taper off prednisone." My rheumaologist's first goal was PMR remission and the second goal was to get me off prednisone.

Jump to this post

Thanks for this link. I believe we all develop cancerous cells and infections but the immune cells do their best to keep it in check and clear the damage.

"My rheumatologist doesn't think my immune system will "forget" anytime soon what it has been attacking for many years.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4067599/
I wish someone would debunk this idea for me."

If these immune cells are involved in pmr, suppressing them would, it seems to me, only lead to other health issues.

REPLY
@dadcue

There is an abundance of 'trial and error' when treating any medical condition. No two people are the same so what works for one may not work for someone else.

I don't know for sure if I'm "PMR free" or not. I have been "prednisone free" for almost three years. I still take the biologic and I'm "relatively pain free" and "PMR condition free" until the biologic is stopped. According to my rheumatologist, PMR goes into remission and the pain is relieved but my PMR condition still exists. He thinks my immune system has been attacking me for a very long time. A characteristic of the adaptive immune system is to "remember" what it attacks. My rheumatologist doesn't think my immune system will "forget" anytime soon what it has been attacking for many years.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4067599/
I wish someone would debunk this idea for me.

Prednisone never helped my overall condition but it did quickly relieve much of the pain. That is how Prednisone is deceptive because it doesn't change the overall course of the condition if you need to wait for PMR to "burn itself out."

My rheumatologist is reluctant to stop the biologic again because my condition worsens. I wouldn't say I have PMR relapses but my condition deteriorates and I need to go back on prednisone again temporarily. When the biologic is restarted it takes time to work. There isn't the immediate gratification of pain relief like prednisone provides which is deceiving in my opinion. People are not well if they need to take prednisone every day! Symptomatic relief and waiting for the PMR condition to burn itself out is not good enough. The waiting and the long term side effects from prednisone is a recipe for disaster in my opinion.

The biologic takes a few weeks to work. I currently do a monthly infusion which is nice because I don't worry anymore about how much prednisone to take each and every day. That is what "prednisone free' means to me. I don't want to take long term prednisone again but I will if it is necessary for a short period of time. My slow motion relapses don't happen instantly like when my prednisone dose got too low which often happened overnight. I don't feel like the biologic fails when it is stopped. When my condition deteriorates and the pain becomes more than I can tolerate, prednisone is restarted. I only take 15-20 mg of prednisone for a short period of time. Fortunately my condition dramatically improves again when the biologic is restarted. I then taper off prednisone again in a couple of weeks. This was a 'trial and error' approach to see if the biologic could be stopped. However, one interruption was a supply chain problem during Covid when the biologic was not available. The biologic can easily be stopped unlike prednisone when people become dependent on it.
https://www.medicinenet.com/steroid_withdrawal/article.htm
My rheumatologist had two goals when he sought approval for the biologic. The way the request was was worded --- "all other alternatives failed" (notably methotrexate and leflunomide and a few other steroid sparing medications) AND "inability to taper off prednisone." My rheumaologist's first goal was PMR remission and the second goal was to get me off prednisone.

Jump to this post

You mention that when your Rheumatologist made application for the biologic it was advised "that all other alternatives had failed". Do you know what evidence was presented on the application to show that the other alternative drugs had failed ? Were there objective biomarkers that demonstrated drug failure or was it you telling the Rheumatologist that you still needed Prednisone to control symptoms? I am curious because i will probably be going down this path and its not clear to me what specific criteria have to be met for a PMR patient to be approved for biologic drugs (its likely to be fairly similar in the US and Australia)

REPLY
@mtr2601

You mention that when your Rheumatologist made application for the biologic it was advised "that all other alternatives had failed". Do you know what evidence was presented on the application to show that the other alternative drugs had failed ? Were there objective biomarkers that demonstrated drug failure or was it you telling the Rheumatologist that you still needed Prednisone to control symptoms? I am curious because i will probably be going down this path and its not clear to me what specific criteria have to be met for a PMR patient to be approved for biologic drugs (its likely to be fairly similar in the US and Australia)

Jump to this post

At the time, Actemra (tocilizumab) was FDA approved for GCA but not PMR. My rheumatologist wanted me to try Actemra for PMR since he was reading the available research from the GIACTA trial.
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa1613849
The way my rheumatologist asked me was, "IF he could get it approved, would I be willing to try Actemra?" He made it sound like it would be hard to get it approved but he would make the effort and submit the paperwork that was needed.

I was interested in trying any biologic but I wasn't too excited about Actemra simply because I had never heard of it. No biologic was FDA approved for PMR at the time. The request was made but it didn't seem likely to be approved. The FDA doesn't control what doctors prescribe but doctors must follow the current "standards of care" for treating patients. If a medication isn't FDA approved for a condition it is considered to be "experimental."

Insurance companies don't usually pay for experimental treatments. Hospitals also follow a medication formulary. For expensive medications doctors need to justify why they want to give the medication to the patient if it isn't FDA approved for the condition being treated. This is because the hospital won't be reimbursed for the cost of the medication. Also, if the treatment causes harm to the patient, there are liability issues.

Every hospital has their own protocols for this situation but doctors are required to give justification if their treatment doesn't follow current standards of care. I wasn't involved in the decision making but I read the documentation that was put in my medical records. That was where my rheumatologist made the assertion that all other alternatives were tried and had failed.

I personally think my rheumatologist embellished my case but technically he was correct. There was some kind of medical panel that decided to approve his request. The recommendation by the medical panel was to follow the guidelines for treating a patient who had GCA. Since Actemra was an FDA approved biologic for GCA, they concluded Actemra "might work for PMR." It was essentially a "trial of one" to give me Actemra --- that was in 2018.

Last year Kevzara was FDA approved for PMR.

“With the approval of Kevzara for polymyalgia rheumatica, patients now have an FDA-approved treatment to help offer relief from the disabling symptoms of this disease and long-term dependence on steroids.”
https://www.vasculitisfoundation.org/us-fda-approves-regeneron-sanofis-kevzara-to-treat-polymyalgia-rheumatica/#:~:text=Kevzara%20has%20been%20approved%20as,IL%2D6%2Dmediated%20signalling.
Kevzara and Actemra block the IL-6 inflammation pathway that is implicated in both PMR and GCA. The criteria for allowing doctors to prescribe these biologics to treat PMR and GCA has now loosened considerably in the US since they are FDA approved. I think "long term dependence on steroids" is no longer applicable because many people seem to get Kevzara soon after being diagnosed with PMR.

Actemra still isn't FDA approved for PMR because the research seeking approval from the FDA hasn't been submitted. However, many people are being prescribed Actemra for GCA.

REPLY
@dadcue

Hydrocortisone was the suggestion I received when I got to 3 mg. It was just a suggestion and my endocrinologist said it would be okay to stay on prednisone if I wished.

I want to commend you for persevering. It was extremely difficult for me at those lower doses. I was so tempted to increase my prednisone dose when I was encouraged to do so. My endocrinologist supported me and said I could increase my dose if I 'felt the need.' She wanted to know about it preferably before I increased but she didn't require that I notify her first.

I hope you are getting the support you need. I had the advantage of being on an alternative medication that wasn't suppressing my adrenal function. That allowed me to taper off prednisone more easily but it was still extremely difficult.

Jump to this post

Are you talking about hydrocortisone cream?

REPLY
@bunnybear

Are you talking about hydrocortisone cream?

Jump to this post

Oral hydrocortisone, typically 15–25 mg daily, taken in divided doses is used for adrenal insufficiency.

Topical hydrocortisone cream is more for localized inflammation on areas of the skin.

Hydrocortisone is short acting so in theory, hydrocortisone tablets don't suppress adrenal function all day long like prednisone tablets do.

REPLY
@dadcue

Thank-you for sharing this information. It is always interesting how other countries treat their medical conditions.

In the USA, prednisone tablets actually come in two forms. One is the more common form — a "regular" immediate-release form that can be split or cut in half but it is tedious because the tablets are small. There is also a delayed-release formulation, called Rayos. Prednisone and Rayos are the same medication, but Rayos is designed to start working 4 hours after you take it. Rayos is the coated form of Prednisone that can't be divided.

I doubt anyone in the USA is allowed to have Rayos except possibly for rare circumstances. Insurance companies say it is too expensive and not medically necessary so they won't pay for it.

I'm always curious whether or not there is any medical research that supports a tapering plan like you suggest. There are many tapering strategies but no research that supports one strategy more than another. Whether one strategy works better than another is purely subjective. I think doctors in the USA would support it if there was evidence this tapering strategy works. Do doctors in the UK actually prescribe prednisolone that way?

I tried every tapering plan I could think of after PMR was diagnosed. I failed miserably for more than 12 years. It was hard on my ego not to be able to taper off prednisone quickly. I was able to successfully taper off Prednisone countless times during the 20 years before I was diagnosed with PMR. I was able to taper off Prednisone quickly when treated for a different autoimmune condition called uveitis which can also lead to blindness. A 100 mg to zero Prednisone taper in a month or two was never a problem. Granted that was to treat another autoimmune condition that was more "responsive" to prednisone and went into remission quickly. My ophthalmologist praised me for being "skilled with prednisone tapers."

In my opinion, the "pain symptoms of PMR" respond to prednisone but the "PMR condition" does not. I base this opinion on being able to taper off prednisone very quickly after a biologic was tried. PMR actually responded well to the biologic so I don't take prednisone anymore. My condition has improved dramatically! Once my PMR condition was targeted and treated ... then I was able to taper off Prednisone relatively quickly which is what my rheumatologist wanted to happen. Prednnisone is not recommended for long term use because of the known serious side effects that most patients experience sooner or later.

Jump to this post

I used Dexamethasone. Medicare drug plan did cover. I am not sure if its similar to Rayos but it works quicker and lasts longer. Its about 5 to 6 times stronger than prednisone so you need to adjust the dosage accordingly. I had no trouble with tapering off. My PMR lasted about 6 months and I was off.

REPLY
@mtr2601

You mention that when your Rheumatologist made application for the biologic it was advised "that all other alternatives had failed". Do you know what evidence was presented on the application to show that the other alternative drugs had failed ? Were there objective biomarkers that demonstrated drug failure or was it you telling the Rheumatologist that you still needed Prednisone to control symptoms? I am curious because i will probably be going down this path and its not clear to me what specific criteria have to be met for a PMR patient to be approved for biologic drugs (its likely to be fairly similar in the US and Australia)

Jump to this post

I just reread your question.

Simple answer ... yes my inflammation markers (CRP and ESR) were checked routinely. I don't recall any time when these biomarkers were not elevated. Prednisone decreased my biomarkers but rarely were they within the normal range. Actemra normalized my CRP and ESR. I was so surprised that I asked by rheumatologist if my CRP and ESR were "too low." These labs aren't reliable when a person is taking Actemra but my symptoms were also nil.

I still recall the day when I was on 30 mg of Prednisone. My rheumatologist was surprised when my CRP and ESR were STILL elevated and said I should take 35 mg. On 35 mg, my ESR and CRP were "mildly elevated." Multiple NSAIDs and DMARDs in addition to prednisone were tried but mildly elevated was the best I could ever achieve unless my prednisone dose was very high.

My biomarkers were used in conjunction with my symptoms. I would tell my rheumatologist when I experienced more pain when I tried to taper Prednisone lower. I think she believed me but she would check my inflammation markers just to see if my inflammation markers correlated with my symptoms. My CRP and ESR always correlated with my symptoms so my rheumatologist would say increasing my prednisone dose was warranted.

Actemra was approved on the basis that nothing else worked well. The other criteria was that I was "unable to taper off prednisone." All other alternatives including methotrexated had failed to normalized my inflammation markers but also for other reasons like infections and/or side effects.

Sometimes the failure of a medication was because of my intolerance for the medication. For example, methotrexate was working to control my PMR symptoms. I took methotrexate for more than a year. However, methotrextate over time increased my liver enzymes and was making me sick.

Does that answer your question any better?

REPLY
Please sign in or register to post a reply.