Bone turnover markers (CTX and P1NP): do you have a baseline?

Posted by mayblin @mayblin, Mar 27 11:05am

Currently i am on forteo therapy with a couple bone markers tests done. However, I didnt have ctx or p1np tested before the start of forteo as a baseline, regrettably.

It is known that the CTX value varies greatly among different individuals, with a very wide range. For post menopausal women, the range could be 34 - 1037 pg/ml; while for perimenopausal women 34-635 pg/ml. Different labs also have a slight different range values.

CTX, a bone resorption (breakdown) marker, is heavily influenced by a number of factors, such as food intake, circadian variation and exercise/life style, etc.

Bone remodeling is a dynamic and complex process. CTX itself may not fully reveal the whole picture. The bone building marker P1NP, is a lot less influenced by external factors. Taking both into consideration at the same time may shed more lights than looking at CTX or P1NP alone.

For those who had their CTX and P1NP tested before treatment with a bone drug, could you share the results if you don't mind? Thanks a lot!

Interested in more discussions like this? Go to the Osteoporosis & Bone Health Support Group.

@mayblin

I see. Hopefully your doc figures out whether or not there is a secondary cause and finds a best solution going forward!

Having food before blood drawing for bone marker testing is known to affect results, especially with CTX. According to one published paper, "Feeding/fasting state has an impact on BTMs. Morning feeding decreased PINP (3.8%), OC (4.1%), uNTX (7.9%), and CTX (17.8%) while bone ALP did not vary significantly". Your cup of coffee with sugar may or maynot cause too much change in CTX. With regards to time of testing, "CTX showed the greatest diurnal fluctuation. Peak levels were observed between 0130 and 0430 hours and were 40% to 60% higher than the 24-hour mean, while the nadir was observed between 1100 and 1500 hours. The lowest value was 40% to 60% below the 24-hour mean". This is probably why Dr. McCormick recommends to get btms done within first hour of waking up, if possible.

Jump to this post

I really don't care what McCormick recommends.

REPLY

mayblin,
this was such a genius idea. You might have to introduce it again because I was disappointed to see so few numbers. Mine:
The legend declines a normal for either
CTX
294 pg/mL 3/24/23
438 pg/mL 7/19/23
457 pg/mL 8/22/23
P1NP
67 mcg/L 3/24/23
73mcg/L 7/19/23
75mcg/L 8/22/23
Was I low on osteoclasts initially? Or do you see this as a usual trend. Did I miss the initial P1NP high.

REPLY
@gently

mayblin,
this was such a genius idea. You might have to introduce it again because I was disappointed to see so few numbers. Mine:
The legend declines a normal for either
CTX
294 pg/mL 3/24/23
438 pg/mL 7/19/23
457 pg/mL 8/22/23
P1NP
67 mcg/L 3/24/23
73mcg/L 7/19/23
75mcg/L 8/22/23
Was I low on osteoclasts initially? Or do you see this as a usual trend. Did I miss the initial P1NP high.

Jump to this post

thanks for your set of btms results, @gently !

First question came to mind is: for your baseline testing, did you have the controllable variables under control? Most of us went for bone marker testing for the first time knowing nothing about optimal timing, fasting etc. Some of those factors could be well managed for a more accurate results.

I truly wished I had the baseline bone markers for future references. The one and only opportunity in the therapy journey - treatment naive state - is forever lost.

REPLY
@mayblin

thanks for your set of btms results, @gently !

First question came to mind is: for your baseline testing, did you have the controllable variables under control? Most of us went for bone marker testing for the first time knowing nothing about optimal timing, fasting etc. Some of those factors could be well managed for a more accurate results.

I truly wished I had the baseline bone markers for future references. The one and only opportunity in the therapy journey - treatment naive state - is forever lost.

Jump to this post

I never knew about the CTX blood test until I read about it on this site. I went to my bloodwork and looked at the trends and the numbers. My endocrinologist failed to mention this test and it does seem to be important. I am 67 years old my osteo numbers have gotten better because I am doing bio, identical, hormones, resistance, training, vitamins, etc., my CTX number now stands at 300. The norms on the blood test say anything above 1300 is considered a significant bone turnover am very new to this. If there’s anything you could shed light on I would appreciate it. I looked at my trends over the last 10 years, and they have dropped significantly , the highest was 810 years ago and now 300. They wanted to put me on Polea 10 years ago and I refused that’s when I really ramped up exercise Pilates, vitamins, and my nutrition. Two years ago I went on for two months and had such horrific side effects. I said never again I wound up fainting etc. it was a nightmare, any information on this I would greatly appreciate. I did ask my integrative medicine doctor to also include the P1NP for my bloodwork this month. Thank you for anybody that knows anything about this

REPLY
@nme1985

I never knew about the CTX blood test until I read about it on this site. I went to my bloodwork and looked at the trends and the numbers. My endocrinologist failed to mention this test and it does seem to be important. I am 67 years old my osteo numbers have gotten better because I am doing bio, identical, hormones, resistance, training, vitamins, etc., my CTX number now stands at 300. The norms on the blood test say anything above 1300 is considered a significant bone turnover am very new to this. If there’s anything you could shed light on I would appreciate it. I looked at my trends over the last 10 years, and they have dropped significantly , the highest was 810 years ago and now 300. They wanted to put me on Polea 10 years ago and I refused that’s when I really ramped up exercise Pilates, vitamins, and my nutrition. Two years ago I went on for two months and had such horrific side effects. I said never again I wound up fainting etc. it was a nightmare, any information on this I would greatly appreciate. I did ask my integrative medicine doctor to also include the P1NP for my bloodwork this month. Thank you for anybody that knows anything about this

Jump to this post

Sorry I went on actonel with great regrets!

REPLY
@mayblin

thanks for your set of btms results, @gently !

First question came to mind is: for your baseline testing, did you have the controllable variables under control? Most of us went for bone marker testing for the first time knowing nothing about optimal timing, fasting etc. Some of those factors could be well managed for a more accurate results.

I truly wished I had the baseline bone markers for future references. The one and only opportunity in the therapy journey - treatment naive state - is forever lost.

Jump to this post

Mayblin, thanks for looking at the bone markers.
I ran five miles just prior to my labs which were at 7am. Probably raising both numbers. Other variables were controlled.
My base numbers look kind of good to me. Can you speculate?

REPLY

It seems to me that if there were some magical ideal bone marker values. those would be well known and any practioner worth consulting would know them. It is an interesting exercise to share our baseline numbers and I have done so. However, if my understanding is correct, my baseline numbers are in the range McCormick likes to see. Does that mean I don't have osteoporosis although my DEXA says I do? Or maybe it means I have stabilized. Or maybe the values have very limited meaning.

REPLY
@normahorn

It seems to me that if there were some magical ideal bone marker values. those would be well known and any practioner worth consulting would know them. It is an interesting exercise to share our baseline numbers and I have done so. However, if my understanding is correct, my baseline numbers are in the range McCormick likes to see. Does that mean I don't have osteoporosis although my DEXA says I do? Or maybe it means I have stabilized. Or maybe the values have very limited meaning.

Jump to this post

@normahorn you brought up a great point! Bone turnover markers are far from perfect as diagnostic or therapeutic aids. However, since Dexa is pretty much the only gold standard for estimating our bone health - density here, we could use bone markers for a ‘peak’ into the state of our bone tunnover. Moreover, Dexa is usually done annually or biannually to see any significant changes of bone density. To some, that’s torturously long. Why would one spend $$$ in therapy, consultations but not couple of bone markers to monitor?

You baseline is interesting to say the least. Your btms are not telling us an overt high turnover state. It will be nice to know your Dexa changes over the years if you have. Your family history will shed some lights as to your susceptibility to op genetically. A good clinician will combine all the factors together, not just by looking at your Dexa, to make a judgement or decision about the probable cause of your osteopenia/osteoporosis, and proceed to treatment if necessary.

After reading a bit about CLL, my uneducated thinking is: would CLL causing disturbances of monocytes/macrophage lineage differentiating to osteoclast precursors? Osteoblasts also originate from mesenchymal stem cells from bone marrow. If CLL affects any of those cell differentiation, bone remodeling will be affected and your btms might appear to be alright but your bone quality/density may be affected. My two cents

REPLY
@nme1985

I never knew about the CTX blood test until I read about it on this site. I went to my bloodwork and looked at the trends and the numbers. My endocrinologist failed to mention this test and it does seem to be important. I am 67 years old my osteo numbers have gotten better because I am doing bio, identical, hormones, resistance, training, vitamins, etc., my CTX number now stands at 300. The norms on the blood test say anything above 1300 is considered a significant bone turnover am very new to this. If there’s anything you could shed light on I would appreciate it. I looked at my trends over the last 10 years, and they have dropped significantly , the highest was 810 years ago and now 300. They wanted to put me on Polea 10 years ago and I refused that’s when I really ramped up exercise Pilates, vitamins, and my nutrition. Two years ago I went on for two months and had such horrific side effects. I said never again I wound up fainting etc. it was a nightmare, any information on this I would greatly appreciate. I did ask my integrative medicine doctor to also include the P1NP for my bloodwork this month. Thank you for anybody that knows anything about this

Jump to this post

Nme1985,
I didn't know about CTX prior to getting bloodwork before starting Evenity. I asked the nurse if I needed to fast. She said no. I had the bloodwork done about 10 am. My CTX was 262. There was no P1NP that was ordered. The remaining markers for kidney, liver, inflammation wre WNL. My Dexa was -2,8 lumbar and -2,0 hip. I had previously been on Actonel for 10 years before the FDA came out with warnings about duration of treatment. I was off it for about 9 years before my last DEXA so I should have had a whole new skeleton. I plan to ask for P1NP in addition to a FASTING CTX. It's unfortunate that patients have to do this level of research in order to get the care that we deserve.

REPLY

I totally agree with you. I was only on the actonel for two months. Your ctx number was great! I am praying my numbers stay the same or improve. Good luck! You have been so helpful as well as others thank you so much

REPLY
Please sign in or register to post a reply.