Just now when I went to my bookmarked Youtube page, the video awaiting my viewing was precisely about this topic. I think they are legit doctors, but it is on my list of questions for my urologist on Tuesday ("Is Dr.Mark Scholz from the Prostate Research Institute legitimate?")
I just looked at this video, and if they are suggesting that the PSMA agent in a PSMA pet scan is consumed as an energy source by the prostate cancer they are incorrect. The psma binds to a protein that the prostate cancer produces. They also state that a pet scan is useless. That is also incorrect. The PSMA pet scan is better than a typical PET scan, but a typical pit scan is not useless.
I do not believe that there is evidence that sugar is food for prostate cancer cells. My understanding is that all prostate cancer diets (e.g. UCSF) eliminate sugar due to the effect of sugar on the body, as outlined in the video link within an earlier comment. Primarily the is associated with overall metabolic health and treatment effectiveness.
No . The less refined sugar you eat, the better in general. But I have watched 2 friends die from other cancers after eliminating all sugar from their diet - including fruit.
It’s just another ‘alternative’ treatment that might delay necessary medical intervention.
For years I tried to lower my BP and cholesterol with diet, vitamins, exercise, etc. A losing battle. What did the trick? Norvasc and Crestor!! And they cost a hell of a lot less with Medicare than all those high priced organic extracts I tried. Best of luck!
AL
I have been reading that sugar is the primary fuel of cancer. It has been recommended that all sugars, including fructose, be eliminated from my diet. I love my blueberries! Is there truth and science to this assertion?
I have been reading that sugar is the primary fuel of cancer. It has been recommended that all sugars, including fructose, be eliminated from my diet. I love my blueberries! Is there truth and science to this assertion?
Eating a heathy diet can reduce the risk of getting cancer and the risk of recurrence. Less sugar is usually part of a health diet.
I don't think you have to give up your beloved blueberries. There is research underlining that berries are good for prostate health. The anthocyanins in blueberries are a type of flavonoid, known for their antioxidant properties and potential health benefits. Research has shown that blueberry anthocyanin can help inhibit the proliferation of cancer cells. https://newsnetwork.mayoclinic.org/discussion/the-power-of-blueberries/
After research I found articles that discuss fructose issues. Consensus is eating a small amount of fruit does not increase the risk of prostate cancer. In fact, studies suggest that higher fruit consumption, particularly citrus fruits, is associated with a modest reduction in prostate cancer risk.
The only thing you want to be careful of with fruit is the same as with sugar, eating too much causes metabolic issues, though too much fruit gives cancer some to feed plus you have metabolic issues.
As for blueberries, consumer reports produce ratings rate the organic domestic and imported blueberries as very safe to eat. Both domestic and imported blueberries that are not organic are really, not safe to eat.
After research I found articles that discuss fructose issues. Consensus is eating a small amount of fruit does not increase the risk of prostate cancer. In fact, studies suggest that higher fruit consumption, particularly citrus fruits, is associated with a modest reduction in prostate cancer risk.
The only thing you want to be careful of with fruit is the same as with sugar, eating too much causes metabolic issues, though too much fruit gives cancer some to feed plus you have metabolic issues.
As for blueberries, consumer reports produce ratings rate the organic domestic and imported blueberries as very safe to eat. Both domestic and imported blueberries that are not organic are really, not safe to eat.
Once again, your body runs on sugar. More-complex carbs and proteins get broken down to glucose during the digestive process. If you somehow managed to stop your body from producing enough glucose to feed the cancer cells, your brain (among other organs) would fail as well
OTOH, since weight gain and diabetes are both common complications of hormone therapy, it is still a very good idea to go *extremely* easy on the refined sugar. Just don't expect it to stop your cancer. Best of luck, everyone!
I just looked at this video, and if they are suggesting that the PSMA agent in a PSMA pet scan is consumed as an energy source by the prostate cancer they are incorrect. The psma binds to a protein that the prostate cancer produces. They also state that a pet scan is useless. That is also incorrect. The PSMA pet scan is better than a typical PET scan, but a typical pit scan is not useless.
Connect
Connect
Like
Helpful
Hug
I just looked at this video, and if they are suggesting that the PSMA agent in a PSMA pet scan is consumed as an energy source by the prostate cancer they are incorrect. The psma binds to a protein that the prostate cancer produces. They also state that a pet scan is useless. That is also incorrect. The PSMA pet scan is better than a typical PET scan, but a typical pit scan is not useless.
-
Like -
Helpful -
Hug
1 ReactionI do not believe that there is evidence that sugar is food for prostate cancer cells. My understanding is that all prostate cancer diets (e.g. UCSF) eliminate sugar due to the effect of sugar on the body, as outlined in the video link within an earlier comment. Primarily the is associated with overall metabolic health and treatment effectiveness.
-
Like -
Helpful -
Hug
2 Reactions@firespooks You might like to read this member's question about sugar and the first few responses from our Director, Colleen Young, and myself.
https://connect.mayoclinic.org/discussion/should-sugar-be-eliminated-from-diet-in-a-cancer-patient/
When you read this you will see my response on what my Integrative Medicine physician told me about sugar.
I hope this helps in answering your questions.
Thanks. Again, it is a part of my Orgovyx diet. If it makes it any more difficult for the PC it is a bonus.
No . The less refined sugar you eat, the better in general. But I have watched 2 friends die from other cancers after eliminating all sugar from their diet - including fruit.
It’s just another ‘alternative’ treatment that might delay necessary medical intervention.
For years I tried to lower my BP and cholesterol with diet, vitamins, exercise, etc. A losing battle. What did the trick? Norvasc and Crestor!! And they cost a hell of a lot less with Medicare than all those high priced organic extracts I tried. Best of luck!
AL
-
Like -
Helpful -
Hug
4 ReactionsI have been reading that sugar is the primary fuel of cancer. It has been recommended that all sugars, including fructose, be eliminated from my diet. I love my blueberries! Is there truth and science to this assertion?
@cecilbaker55, I moved your question about sugar and cancer to this existing conversation. I encourage you to click the link and read the comments.
- Sugar abstinence for prostate cancer https://connect.mayoclinic.org/discussion/sugar-abstinence-for-prostate-cancer/
There is a lot of myth and misinformation about sugar's role in cancer. For that reason, Mayo Clinic provides this information:
- Sugar's Role in Cancer https://connect.mayoclinic.org/blog/cancer-education-center/newsfeed-post/sugars-role-in-cancer-1/
Eating a heathy diet can reduce the risk of getting cancer and the risk of recurrence. Less sugar is usually part of a health diet.
I don't think you have to give up your beloved blueberries. There is research underlining that berries are good for prostate health. The anthocyanins in blueberries are a type of flavonoid, known for their antioxidant properties and potential health benefits. Research has shown that blueberry anthocyanin can help inhibit the proliferation of cancer cells.
https://newsnetwork.mayoclinic.org/discussion/the-power-of-blueberries/
-
Like -
Helpful -
Hug
6 ReactionsReply to @cecilbaker55
After research I found articles that discuss fructose issues. Consensus is eating a small amount of fruit does not increase the risk of prostate cancer. In fact, studies suggest that higher fruit consumption, particularly citrus fruits, is associated with a modest reduction in prostate cancer risk.
The only thing you want to be careful of with fruit is the same as with sugar, eating too much causes metabolic issues, though too much fruit gives cancer some to feed plus you have metabolic issues.
As for blueberries, consumer reports produce ratings rate the organic domestic and imported blueberries as very safe to eat. Both domestic and imported blueberries that are not organic are really, not safe to eat.
Once again, your body runs on sugar. More-complex carbs and proteins get broken down to glucose during the digestive process. If you somehow managed to stop your body from producing enough glucose to feed the cancer cells, your brain (among other organs) would fail as well
OTOH, since weight gain and diabetes are both common complications of hormone therapy, it is still a very good idea to go *extremely* easy on the refined sugar. Just don't expect it to stop your cancer. Best of luck, everyone!
-
Like -
Helpful -
Hug
2 ReactionsThey are not talking about PSMA but older, glucose-based PET scans.