← Return to Anyone using Nicotine patches for Long Covid?
DiscussionAnyone using Nicotine patches for Long Covid?
Post-COVID Recovery & COVID-19 | Last Active: 2 days ago | Replies (154)Comment receiving replies
Replies to "This is extremely interesting, and something my girlfriend and I have joked about. She is a..."
The site will not let me post link.
Search:
Long covid nicotine
Treatment 7 mg patch
To read on the multimode of action of nicotine search:
Nictotine mode of action Sars CoV-2
This is not an accident or coincidence. I dipped snuff 39 years and had the flu only twice with no vaccines. No stomach or other viruses to speak of. My family, wife and kids, were typically sick from the exposure at the disease factory (schools).
In 2018 my insurance company made me quit. After some months I started experiencing the same sicknesses my family did.
Irony. No. Causation, loss of nicotine protection, anti-inflamatory effect, and loss of alkaloid impact on virus replication.
Each average dip of Copenhagen long cut (strongest) has about 12 to 13 mg nicotine.
It take three 4 mg gums to equal or two 7 mg patches or two Zyn (just short).
To further exemplify the impact, I would typically have 6 to 8 dips per day (16 to 17 hour work day).
Immunity.
The medical complex says nicotine is addictive. Really, I am not addicted to potato, tomato, tomatilla, peppers, or other nicotine producing species in the family Solanaceae (nightshade).
Tradh medicine. The additives in tobacco are the addictive components, not nicotine. Tobacco is in the same plant family (botanical) as tomato, pepper, potato, eggplant, and tomatilla and many other genera.
I wish I knew this about nicotine in 2020.
Remember when....
Eggs were bad
Coffee was bad (coffee is in bitter herb family and very good for your heart and brain)
Butter was bad
Margarine was good
Marbelled meat was bad
All oils were bad
All fats where bad...
Do you wonder why we have an epidemic of hip, knee, and shoulder replacements? Impact on hyuronic acid and senovial fluid.
Poor statistics and bad designs in the hands of those ignorant of populations studies, proper sample size, and design to test the hypothesis properly have made us all sick.
Study increase in allergic response to peanuts after doctors research directed the medical community to remove peanuts from the diet of pregnant and nursing women.
It went up drastically. Does this not seem counter intuitive to remove foods that pass through the embelycal cord?