Tulsa Pro - share your experiences

Posted by bjroc @bjroc, Nov 28, 2023

I want to thank all for support on my recent prostate cancer treatment, Tulsa pro. I am very thankful to my wife and my daughter who helped out lots with support. I am thankful to Mayo for finally finding the extent of the problem with a transperineal biopsy. I am also very thankful to Dr Scionti in Sarasota for being a true expert for the Tulsa procedure. Tulsa leaves everything intact except for the prostate cancer tissue plus some tissue as a safety margin near it. It goes nowhere near sphincters and nerves. I was very glad to not have any extra prostatic cancer, or cancer in seminal vesicles, ducts, nerves etc. I did have PSMA scan showing this. We will just have to see if everything works out in the long run cancer wise.

What I had cancer wise
Originally in 2021 I had a small spot seen in transition zone. It got some 3+3 more toward back where they could reach via trans rectal biopsy (done at a local university), but they could not reach the anterior where most of it was in 2021. My 2023 Mayo done transperineal biopsy had one needle at the anterior transition zone with all Gleason 4, it was not a big spot (0.2 mm caught in needle). Keep in mind in 2021 further to back it had just Gleason 3. I am not going to get caught up in Gleason scores, I know what was sampled in past, and though one needle had 4 in the front/top of anterior it was just a tiny spot in this tumor and most toward posterior was not hit here in 2023. There was also a small 3+4 on one side seen now in 2023. My PSA headed up steadily during the 2.75 years on surveillance. My final prostate size before any treatment was 110 cc, and final PSA around 16.

What worked on biopsy, and what did not.
2021: Trans rectal in 2021 biopsy did not sample well, missed most of what is in anterior transition zone and one of my problem areas. But since then, I have had plenty of time to read on things like Tulsa pro, radiation types, and so on. So was glad to have the time.
2023: Mayo Transperineally done biopsy caught the problems.

Some things I learned about MRI
What I learned is that, for me at least, diffusion weighted MRI shows very clearly what docs need to see to treat. Regular contrast enhanced MRI left my doctors not that sure, sometimes even confused. Diffusion weighted MRI to me was crystal clear where things were and what needed to be treated. Only Dr Scionti seemed geared up for diffusion weighted MRI. That includes other places I asked for initial consult, and Mayo that I went to for a while – all geared up for contrast enhanced MRI only really seemed like.

Who does new kinds of treatments.
Mayo is top notch for advanced cancers that have spread, but I learned they are just starting out with other new treatments like Tulsa Pro. I liked Mayo’s proton as a possibility, but they have filled many slots for it, and sometimes it is hard to get through insurance from what they said to me. They also do everything under protocols, they have to develop those for these new treatments of any kind since everyone looks at Mayo. So in some ways they are behind a bit, having to do everything with a protocol instead of just looking out for what is best for one individual patient. Thus, I found I had to call around if I wanted anything new. Some places are better than others seemed like to me at calling places. The best I heard from was Dr Scionti in Sarasota.

Before Tulsa for me
Because the size of my prostate was large, and one needle had all Gl 4, we did bicalutamide and dutasteride for several months. They want that temperature up during Tulsa at the top so while I still met the Tulsa size limits we shrunk things a bit to be sure.

Travel
I had to travel to Sarasota, about a 22 hour drive for me. Found a nice Airbnb down there not too far away. I drove since date of coming back was uncertain. I wanted his office to take catheter out, others might fly and self remove catheter I understand, but I was unsure about that. It is good I rented an Airbnb for more than two weeks is all I can say.

Tulsa procedure
Obviously asleep, seemed to go well. They took out about 2/3 of the prostate tissue with the Tulsa pro. The before and after MRI done while asleep clearly shows the tumors on diffusion weighted MRI, and post procedure MRI with contrast show those same areas treated well and no longer there. Woke up with the bladder spasms a real lot, oxybutynin seemed to really help but it was hard to wake up with Foley catheter and the spasms. Next day the spasms were gone, but it was tough to sit. For ten days with Foley catheter, I watched old Dr Who, movies, and obviously just sleeping. A restful period is the best help, not having to do much was important for me at least. Foley catheter for ten days was no fun but it wasn’t as hard as I imagined perhaps.

Post catheter
Was a bit tough, I still had some inflammation perhaps worse than some get, plus there is scar tissue for up to 6 months, so it was hard to pee. Alpha blocker was a must just to pee. Another couple weeks brings me to now at this writing and it is a lot easier to pee. But it was a hard travel back. I suggest stay in an Airbnb for some time post procedure plus give plenty of time after catheter is out.

Future
We will see if this all worked on the cancer over next year or two, and on after that. Hoping for no recurrence of course.

Interested in more discussions like this? Go to the Prostate Cancer Support Group.

@clandeboye1

@byroc ---
Great detailed information.
What is your health status today -- 1 year later ?

Jump to this post

@clandeboye1 as Dr Scionti is real busy
I don't have an MRI till January since that is where they could get me in as Dr Scionti is real busy. So my big 1 year status got pushed to January. I am just about 1 year though, just ten days short as I write this reply. Everything is clear outside that. I feel best I have in a long time pee wise, and no sexual dysfunction. I am keeping up the exercise and working to get in better general health and that is a long process (I am a sucker for too much pasta I guess.....).

REPLY

I had the same procedure at Mayo Rochester on October 9 a couple weeks ago. They took 60cc of my 100cc prostate. My experience post procedure is similar to yours, although they took the foley catheter out two days after the procedure. I had 14 days of prednisone and 31 days of flomax to help with urination and swelling. So far so good. Since we both have prostate tissue remaining, I'd be interested in knowing how your PSA has settled to a new nadir and what that nadir is. You're almost a year out now from your procedure. I would be interested in knowing how you're doing. Also, how long after your procedure did you begin sluffing dead tissue? I'm just trying to get an idea what I might expect. Thanks much!

REPLY
@bjroc

It did for me, but I don't think that is common. For some reason contrast seemed less effective for me over time, I doubt that is your case. I guess it is always a possibility, probably a very low probability, so how to communicate that to the radiologist to double check the diffusion weighted images if the Pirads rating done with contrast is falling, that I don't know since we almost never see or hear from them. They should be looking at diffusion weighted images, but most don't seem to bother since contrast seems to do the job.

Jump to this post

@byroc ---
Great detailed information.
What is your health status today -- 1 year later ?

REPLY
@clandeboye1

Can anyone comment on their TULSA - PRO precedure experience ?
Comment on your Gleason score and number of leisons . I assume contained within the prostate .
Also any treatments you were on prior or active surveillance .

Jump to this post

REPLY
@clandeboye1

Can anyone comment on their TULSA - PRO precedure experience ?
Comment on your Gleason score and number of leisons . I assume contained within the prostate .
Also any treatments you were on prior or active surveillance .

Jump to this post

REPLY

Can anyone comment on their TULSA - PRO precedure experience ?
Comment on your Gleason score and number of leisons . I assume contained within the prostate .
Also any treatments you were on prior or active surveillance .

REPLY

I had my procedure at Mayo on July 17. My final bill after Medicare and BCBS supplement plan was $6.

REPLY
@bjroc

As far as I understand next Jan 1 of 2025 it has a Medicare code for coverage, but till then it will just a bit over $30K where I had it (Dr Scionti, Sarasota, FL).

For places see:
https://tulsaprocedure.com/
Obviously some are gearing up, some have done it awhile, some have differing acceptance protocols so call multiple places if you can swing the cost.

As far as Flowmax, I only took it one month then switched to Alfuzosin for a month, which has less problems but is no where as strong. Flowmax is needed after the procedure because you would not be able to pee till swelling and so on goes down. For me that was 2 months, some might be longer, some less. It may depend on how much BPH and how much they ablate. But I don't really like Flowmax for regular use, glad I don't need it anymore and if I did I would use Alfuzosin anyway.

Jump to this post

Medicare will pay a portion for TULSA if done in a hospital vs an imaging facility.

REPLY
@bjroc

Well I started the thread let me give you my updates such as they are. You are in good hands with Dr Scionti, I really admire what he is doing. So much red tape runs medicine and he is giving a real option. I am fine, no long term side effects at all, none. My urinary stream is better, sexual function normal and these are things that cause a real lot of concern amongst people, believe me I know. Every once in awhile, like once a month if I carry a big box and put it down with pressure on the wrong area or something, or laugh too hard (politics is a good way to laugh hard) I lose a drop of urine, but it isn't common. Now keep in mind my problem was two fold, cancer and BPH. I had very much BPH and my prostate size was increasing, was at 110 cc on final MRI before Scionti. He gave me dutasteride for a few months before Tulsa, but anyway my BPH causes didn't go away. So that makes my PSA somewhat unreliable. If you are not dealing with BPH that is a real good, because it makes it harder to know where one is. I have just gotten a schedule for a 1 year MRI and followup in his office but Scionti is real busy so it got put in Jan '25 instead of Nov '24 which would be my one year. As far as side effects Tulsa is great, I have less problems now than before as my prostate size was getting to be a problem. I still had ok stream before Tulsa, but it is better now. Much lower ejaculate volume, but not a real issue. I consider Tulsa side effects real low. Those first few months I had to take alpha blocker, but again I had BPH but you may need that too, not sure.... Tulsa seems a real good option, Scionti is top notch. We will see in Jan '25 how the MRI looks as far as cancer concerns.

Jump to this post

Thank you very much for your in depth reply. I am fortunate in that i do not have BPH, but with a growing pi-rads to 5 will have to make a decision sooner then later. Have been on other threads and have heard of even less side effects with MR-guided SBRT? Have also come across another procedure employing ‘The Vanquish Water Ablation System’ Good news is that after speaking with Dr Scionti is that I have the option of Tulsa Pro as it stands. Thank you all for your reply’s and please keep them coming as I’m sure there are plenty to follow who are just as interested.

REPLY

I am the 79 year old that had this procedure on April 10, 2024 and continue to very pleased with the results so far. Everything is working as well as prior and some even a little better!

REPLY
Please sign in or register to post a reply.