Received the news on Halloween. I have prostate cancer. Need advice.
I previously had 2 benign biopsies in 2024. Urologist/Oncologist asked to follow up in a year. So on September 2025, I did PSA (5.4) and MRI (2 legions PI-RADS3, and PI-RADS4). These 2 legions are similar in size with the previous 2 MRI's from 2024.
Doctor ordered a biopsy. On Halloween day, the report came and it shows out of 18 cores, there are 2 Gleason 6, and 1 Gleason 7 (3+4), which is with 40% core, and G4 is 10%.
I am scheduled to see my Urologist/Oncologist on Wednesday. I will ask for a Decipher or Polaris test and a PSMA scan. Maybe a genetic test to check BRCA1, BRCA2 genes?
I am not sure what else to ask from the doctor. Any advice will be greatly appreciated.
Interested in more discussions like this? Go to the Prostate Cancer Support Group.
Connect

@frank1956
Your doctors are the ones to recommend treatments for you. They have your medical and mental health history. Your age 70 indicates many more years of life expectancy.
I had almost the same Gleason scores. The Mayo R/O recommended 20 rounds of photon SBRT radiation with hormone treatment. He then ordered Decipher and bone scan. Bone scan was negative and the Decipher indiacated low risk versus intemediat risk that biopsies indicated. Then Mayo R/O removed the recommendation for hormone treatment just radiation only.
I then went to UFHPTI for second opinion. The R/O there agreed with my diagnosis from Mayo (medical records transferred there) but wanted another test done PSMA. That too came back negative. UFHPTI recommended 30 rounds of radiation proton beam.
I did not get a recommendation from either R/O or my Mayo PCP for active surveillance not did I want to do it. I wanted to address the cancer the earliest I could based on success rates when PC is caught early.
What others did with their treatments was based on their experience and their PC including doctors having their full medical history to make recommendations. We do not have that history nor are we PC medical experts just sharing our experience and what we did with our PC diagnosis, test, treatment, and recovery.
Consider a second opinion when you get all test results (Decipher, PSMA, etc.). Good luck.
-
Like -
Helpful -
Hug
2 ReactionsAfter you see your current doctor get at least a second opinion, preferably at a top level hospital like Mayo, Anderson or MSK.
Then talk to as many men, who have gone through this, to get an idea of what is ahead.
Then decide what suits you best.
Good luck.
-
Like -
Helpful -
Hug
6 ReactionsIt’s good that you’re in information-collecting mode. That will guide you towards an appropriate decision.
> It’s always a good idea to get 2nd opinions on biopsies — not necessarily because you don’t trust the 1st one or don’t like that opinion. But, because much of the interpretation of images and scans is often as much an art as it is a science, and it’s dependent on the skill and experience of the person reading the slides. It’s good to have an independent set of eyes reviewing the biopsy.
> Since you have a “4” cell type in the Gleason score—> In the MRI or biopsy reports, were the words cribriform pattern, extracapsular extension, seminal vesicle invasion, perineural invasion or intraductal carcinoma mentioned? (If not, that’s good.)
> also, ask them to calculate your: % Free PSA, PSA Doubling Time, and PSA Density to see if those are ok or if they indicate any concern.
> the genetic (germline) test will check a few dozen markers that may be related to prostate cancer in addition to BRCA1/BRCA2. (See attached chart for the key markers.)
> I would also ask to bump-up PSA testing to every 4-6 months rather than annually (and calculate those three - % Free PSA, PSA Doubling Time, and PSA Density - at every PSA test). Tracking PSA more actively going forward is important.
-
Like -
Helpful -
Hug
6 Reactionsjeff's is excellent advice. I would want a consultation with a radiation oncologist as well, so I'd ask for a referral.
Sorry for your halloween news.
-
Like -
Helpful -
Hug
3 ReactionsYou are a case where active surveillance would make sense. This was discussed At the PCRI conference today. With a low number of cores you have with a Gleason 6 score, and very little four in the 3+4 There really isn’t a lot of reason to do anything right away. You’re a low PSA score is another reason active surveillance makes sense. Prostate cancer grows very slowly you have a long time to make any decision.
You could get a PSMA pet scan to see if there is spread anywhere in your body.
The Radiation oncologist at the PCRI conference discussing active surveillance was pretty insistent that somebody like you should not be doing treatment yet. You could take a look at the video and see what’s going on.
Here is a video with Dr. Laurence Klotz, one of the experts on active surveillance. He can give you answers as to why you would or would not be a good candidate for active surveillance.
-
Like -
Helpful -
Hug
9 ReactionsBy the way, I am 2 months shy of age 70.