PET scan explanation, findings & personal conclusion

Posted by westernflyer @westernflyer, 9 hours ago

Background: Diagnosis of prostate cancer 2010. Gleason 3+3; PSA: 6.46 noted as slow growth cancer. Underwent proton radiation therapy at Loma Linda Hospital, a pioneer in proton radiation therapy. The time was 2.5 months.

Fast forward to about 2018 when PSA began to rise to the current 5.23. MRI was level 5 meaning the possible recurrence of prostate cancer. Note: The result of the first PET scan in prep for proton radiation therapy shows calcifications within the prostate. This calcification can be interrupted as cancer, particularly during the MRPI procedure.

PET scan 19 February 2024. the scan was from the "skull-thigh". there is a four (4) point scale that categorizes the grade with one (1) being no indication of cancer to four (4) indicating cancer.

Here are the exact findings from the report: PROSTATE: There is dystrophic calcification in the prostate gland. There is mild radiotracer uptake throughout the prostate gland. Score: 1

The report went on with BONE FINDINGS, THYROID, HEART LIVER, SPLEEN AND KIDNEY All scores One (1)

PET scan uses radioactive marker which attached to protein modules associated with cancer. The full body scan I had was designed to detect if there was cancer in other parts of the body. And there was none.

The radiologist vocabulary in the context of PET scan used the word "uptake". The meaning is designed to "gauge" the intensity of the cancer. It is light a match in a dark room. The cancer shows up during the PET scan with the radioactive chemical placed in your body light a "match in a dark room". I research the work "intake" as it applies to the PET scan. Below is the from Google search:
*********************
"Mild radiotracer uptake throughout the prostate gland" on a scan typically indicates a small amount of tracer activity distributed evenly across the prostate, which could be considered normal physiological uptake and may not necessarily signify cancer, but further evaluation by a doctor is often needed to rule out any concerns, especially if there are other clinical findings or factors present.
Key points to remember:
Normal finding:
In many cases, a mild, uniform uptake of tracer in the prostate is considered a normal finding, particularly when using a radiotracer like FDG-PET, which can show some uptake in normal tissues due to their metabolic activity.
Potential causes for mild uptake:
Benign conditions: Inflammation (prostatitis), benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), recent biopsy procedures can sometimes show mild uptake on a scan.

Small, low-grade cancer: While less likely, a very small, low-grade prostate cancer might only show mild uptake on imaging.

Important considerations:
Clinical context: The interpretation of mild uptake should always be considered alongside the patient's clinical presentation, PSA levels, and other imaging findings.

Further investigation: If there are concerns about the mild uptake, further evaluation with additional imaging modalities like MRI or a prostate biopsy might be recommended.
Specific to PSMA PET scans:
PSMA-targeted tracers: When using a PSMA-targeted tracer on a PET scan, even mild uptake in the prostate could be more suggestive of cancer, as PSMA is a protein often overexpressed in prostate cancer cells.
**************************
Conclusion: The PET scan is the most definable indicator of prostate cancer (or any other cancer of the body). Even with all the information from the MRI and PET scan, the endstate is watchful waiting.

PLEASE DO YOUR OWN RESEARCH. EVERY CASE OF PROSTATE CANCER IS DIFFERENT. INFORMATION IS POWER.
Good luck/RH-Florida

Interested in more discussions like this? Go to the Prostate Cancer Support Group.

If you had proton radiation, then they radiated the prostate and essentially eliminated it as a cause of further cancer. The thing is your scan shows no evidence of cancer anywhere, yet your PSA has risen to a level where further treatment, like ADT, seems to have been essential To extend your life.

After radiation treatment, if your PSA continues to rise, it almost always means you’ve got a metastasis or more than one. They could be too small to be seen by a PET scan yet.

The fact that you were a Gleason six makes any treatment something you might be able to avoid, until real cancer growth is discovered.

In your case, a PSE test might make sense. They could at least detect whether or not there is an active cancer in your system, something that is uncertain right now, yet your PSA is rising.

Of course you can always go on ADT and see if it reduces your PSA way down, Thus showing that the cancer is reoccurring.

Hopefully, you can come up with a way to get that PSA down before it becomes a real problem.

REPLY

Thanks for your comment. Since there were no absolute definitive indications of prostate cancer, plus the calcification issue, I plan to continue PSA tests every 4 to 6 months to ascertain the velocity of PSA increases.

The proton radiation done in 2010, some 15 years ago is and was the best option for those who have the time and finances to undergo proton radiation therapy. I recently looked at the bill. Each proton day was $3600 and that was in 2010. With 2.5 months, that should be 50 days of billing. Today's expense must be much more. I fortunately had TriCare for Life (retired military), so aside from housing, my portion was minimal.

I am in excellent health with exercise daily both at home and outside. Time will tell.

REPLY
Please sign in or register to post a reply.