Aromatase Inhibitors: Did you decide to go on them or not?
Nanaloves: I’m about to start arimidex and just feel that the contraindications , bone issues etc. are overwhelming. I’m 70 years old, dodged a bullet I feel with zero stage DCIS but the follow up is pretty much no different then if it was more aggressive. I’ve just done 33 treatments of radiation and now they advise arimidex as a preventative. I’m not sure with the beginnings of arthritis and lower back. sensitivity already that I should take it. Anyone not take it and not have a recurrence within the 5 years.
Interested in more discussions like this? Go to the Breast Cancer Support Group.
That was never mentioned to me sadly, I had grade 3 and my ki67 was high so they just said we highly suggest chemo and radiation. I did tamoxifen and now SI. At this point it’s 10 years in and I wish I had it done. I worry every day if it’s coming back… horrible way to live. My concern are my cancer markers… they fluctuate . Scares me.
@lisajoann I also had LVI but no chemo or radiation. Was your Oncotype Dx score high?
I was diagnosed on my 50th birthday with stage 1, no nodes but lvi… so chem and rad for me…I took tomixifen for 5 years… then AI.., it’s almost 10 years on meds… I have had hot flashes… with tamoxifen…but I was also go through Menopause. The AI has caused a little stiffness, nothing awful…def not anything that stops mean from living my very active life! I will be celebrating my 60th in August!….honestly nervous about going off of it!!!
Everyone is different… just wanted to give you a positive here!!!
My feeling was I rather live with pain… then not live! But I have no real pain! Honestly…My cancer was stage 1… grade 3, that’s aggressive and I had lvi! I think these drugs kept me alive!!
♥️
I agree. It doesn't make sense. I had a small tumor (7mm including clean margins) and clean sentinel lymph node biopsy. Thus a Stage 1A. [And thank heavens it was caught during a routine, overdue mammo and ultra.]
But NX means "hard to interpret lymph nodes." Confusing.
Here's how Sloan Kettering and two other sites define Stage 1B. M.D. Anderson uses the same standard. As does my oncologist at Cleveland Clinic. The definition is the same across the industry.
Sloan-Kettering:
Stage I describes a very early stage of invasive cancer. At this point, tumor cells have spread to normal surrounding breast tissue but are still contained in a small area. Stage I is divided into two subcategories:
In stage IA, a tumor measures up to 20 millimeters (about the size of a grape), and there’s no cancer in the lymph nodes.
Stage IB can be described as either:
a small tumor in the breast that is less than 20 millimeters plus small clusters of cancer cells in the lymph nodes; or
no tumor in the breast plus small clusters of cancer cells in the lymph nodes.
https://www.mskcc.org/cancercare/types/breast/diagnosis/stages-breast
Cancer Center:
Stage 1A: The tumor is very small and has not spread to lymph nodes.
Stage 1B: Cancer between 0.2 mm and 2 mm is found in the lymph nodes (the breast tumor can't be detected or is smaller than 20 mm).
http://www.cancercenter.com
BreastCancer.org:
In general, stage IA describes invasive breast cancer in which: the tumor measures up to 2 centimeters (cm) and the cancer has not spread outside the breast; no lymph nodes are involved
In general, stage IB describes invasive breast cancer in which: there is no tumor in the breast; instead, small groups of cancer cells — larger than 0.2 millimeter (mm) but not larger than 2 mm — are found in the lymph nodes
or there is a tumor in the breast that is no larger than 2 cm, and there are small groups of cancer cells — larger than 0.2 mm but not larger than 2 mm — in the lymph nodes
http://www.breastcancer.org
I think there is misunderstanding here. I was just asking about the contradiction between 1b and NX.
I have noticed a chirpy quality to my two oncologists. It is our choice whether to believe their affect or not. Not judging at all.
Sorry if I expressed myself in a way that made you feel that way. Not intended. I was just curious about the classification especially NX.
And no offense, but why ever shouldn’t they be cheerful and reassuring? Should they be gloomy and in utter despair as a general rule of practice?
The 2 pathologists who independently wrote my report (and of whom I have no knowledge as to their cheerfulness) BOTH classified my tumor as 1b. My surgical and medical team concurs. I had a negative lymph node biopsy and no lymph nodes removed. It was definitely 6 mm with clear margins. And that’s my story.
I’m here to share, not to be lectured to or scolded.
That was what I was saying, sorry to be unclear. I was saying that 1bNX seems like a contradiction, since they were saying 1b supposedly means something found in lymph nodes, and NX means the nodes cannot be evaluated- kind of a contradiction.
Actually, according to my surgeon, nurse navigator, radiation oncologist and medical oncologist, and pathologist, Stage 1b does NOT need lymph node involvement to be classified as 1b. In my case, the size of the tumor (6 mm) was enough for it to be considered 1b rather than 1a.