← Return to Has anyone had MRI suspicious for malignancy but negative Mammo + US?

Discussion
Comment receiving replies
@lifetraveler

Hi! Chris and comrades of the war of beating cancers:

Thanks again for your wise and kind advices!

I am still waiting for UltraSound to be done to find out more information of the lesion in my liver; however, I started to wondering about how much detailed info can US reveal - regarding the real characteristics of that lesion. Will the US be able to tell us whether that lesion in my liver is breast cancer in the liver or something else entirely? Will they / should they put me through another Biopsy to find out the real DNA of that lesion in my liver?

Thanks for any experienced advices! My heart goes out to you all!

Jump to this post


Replies to "Hi! Chris and comrades of the war of beating cancers: Thanks again for your wise and..."

Sadly my experience comes from too much history with cancer in my family. When my brothers lesion in his liver first showed up they looked with ultrasound immediately to rule out a distortion in the MRI or things that were obviously not cancer. Then did a PET/CT to decide it was yes, metastatic cancer in the liver. When they did the PET, all the different tumors lit right up like a Roman candle. Our doctor shows us the scans. This has been true with my husbands bone cancer, and my breast cancer as well. I have been told PET is pretty definitive for cancer but since they are really freakin expensive, they have to jump through a few hoops before they can get it approved. I won’t rant about insurance companies here, I will save that for the comfort of my own home, but I believe that is why they use ultrasound to rule out the obvious first. @mjwhearts22 pretty much summed up the risk of not knowing.
When is your ultrasound scheduled? Do you have a medical oncology appointment yet?