← Return to Pseudomonas aureginosa: When did your doctor decide to start treating?

Discussion
Comment receiving replies
@lilianna

To all who have/had pseudomonas aeruginosa;
when did your doctor decide to start treating this bacterium- were you told to start right away because there is a better chance to get rid of it or if you did not have symptoms (and what symptoms) to wait. I was diagnosed with it last September and my doctor decided to not treat it (no symptoms), I had my RESP culture two weeks ago, I still have "moderate pseudomonas aeruginosa" and my doctor asks me if I think she should treat it. (she says CIPRO) I think I cough more and have some more clear mucus in the morning but otherwise nothing different. How can I know if it should be treated? She says its up to the patients, how they feel and the initial treatment might or might not work. I am also on Azithro and Clofazimine for MAC. Thank you for your thoughts on this.

Jump to this post


Replies to "To all who have/had pseudomonas aeruginosa; when did your doctor decide to start treating this bacterium-..."

I think we're going to the doctor to get their professional, experienced opinion. How are you supposed to know if you should be treated or not? Nowadays some doctors don't want to take a stand thinking of the legal ramifications. What a sorry state of our medical system.

My ID Dr. really drills me on whether I am feeling better or am I feeling worse. My pulmonologist's seem to use the radiological data to see how I feel. Maybe my case is easier for them, I have or had multiple and sometimes severe symptoms.