← Return to Selecting Active Survelliance based on GG1 and small GG2 in biopsy?

Discussion
Comment receiving replies
@trusam1

I don't understand why an active lifestyle would lead one to recommend against surgery?

My own story: after PSA rise from 4 to 6 in a year i I biopsy, ten samples, two @ Gleason 3+3, one @ 4+3. Having done 35 Ironman + 6 other marathons (8x Hawaii, 3x Boston) in the previous 20 years, surgeons told me in spite of my age 74 I was a good candidate for surgery and good immediate recovery in part *because* of my fitness.

Seven months post surgery, I have been using 0-1 pad daily for the past 4 months, competed in more triathlons (shorter distances), and have continually improving sexual function, now @ 22/25 on the ED scale.

Except for 4 weeks of recovery post surgery and 3 months off the bike, the procedure did not impinge on my athletic activity levels or performance, athletic.

Jump to this post


Replies to "I don't understand why an active lifestyle would lead one to recommend against surgery? My own..."

trusam1: Thanks for your encouraging comments! You certainly are in a class of your own regarding your many fitness accomplishments! I wish I had started running earlier in life. I have always been fit and without significant health issues; however, I just started running at age 66 (~18 months ago) and I'm now consistently running 2-3 times a week and participating in the occasional 5K race. The amazing thing is that I could not come close to completing a 5K race 30 years ago and now I do it routinely.

All that said, my positive PC diagnosis was a "shot across the bow", as I'm sure it is for every man who hears those words from their doctor. In any case, I know enough to take my time on making any treatment decision and doing my research so that I am entirely comfortable with whatever course I pursue.

It's good to hear of your quick recovery and ability to get back to your athletic activities. All the best for your future!