Continue PSA surveillance or have a Prostate MRI?

Posted by tgregg99 @tgregg99, Oct 18, 2023

I'm 72 and taking tamsulosin for BPH, it's working. My recent annual Total PSA was 7.41, lower than last year's 8.35 (it was 4.5 in 2018 and has increased a bit annually). However, my Free PSA/PSA Ratio was 29% (it's been 25-32% range since 2018). Both my Urologist and PCP claim my PSA test results point to my BPH and not cancer.

That said, my Urologist recommended I consider having a Prostate MRI, to see if I have any cancer, and if not, possibly save me from an unnecessary biopsy. What to do?

Given my test results and BPH, I'm thinking of continuing my surveillance for now, possibly increasing my PSA test frequency, if my doctor recommends. Wishful thinking or have the MRI?

Thoughts?

Thank you!

Interested in more discussions like this? Go to the Prostate Cancer Support Group.

@kjacko

I have been in a similar situation. I turned 71 in May. My PSA has been on a roller coaster for about 5 years. I had a biopsy a number of years ago which was negative. In 2021 I changed urologists and she recommended an MRI, also negative. This winter my PSA went up to 7 and she recommended a biopsy. I got a second opinion and it was recommended I get an MRI first. It came back negative. My urologist noted that the MRI only examines about 80% of the Prostate. After some discussion I had a biopsy in August. I had 14 cores taken and 1 showed cancer, 3+4=7. I’ve met with two different surgeons and both agreed removal was the best option. I have surgery in 3 weeks. Hope this helps. Best wishes!

Jump to this post

Very helpful, thanks so much ... I wish you all the best !

REPLY
@shelby29

This is my understanding. All cancer cells have DNA. You can have prostate cancer in bones, lungs, etc. Despite where it is its still prostate cancer cells. Bone, lung cancer cells, etc have their own dna

Jump to this post

Very interesting, thanks for the follow up, I appreciate it! President Jimmy Carter had melanoma skin cancer years ago that spread to his brain and that was treated at Emory in Atlanta. Based on your point, after is metastisized to his brain, his cancer remained "skin cancer" with its unique DNA. Makes sense to me, but it'll be a good question for the doctor.

REPLY

..and we do NOT want it to metastasize no matter what!!

REPLY

Absolutely agree, you got that right ! :-). I had melanoma skin cancer in 2014 diagnosed early via biopsy, then a general surgeon excised it and declared it had not spread. He told me "we can never say 100% cured" but he was 99.99% confident it had not metastasized. A good thing, of course. Thanks again.

REPLY

I was diagnosed in 2016 as a result of a biopsy with a Gleason of 3+3. I had 3 more biopsies over the next couple of years. My urologist had resisted ordering a MRI as he wasn't comfortable as to their effectiveness. However, i 2018 he felt that the quality of the MRI's had improved. The MRI showed suspicious cancer in the anterior zone of the prostate which is not the normal location of the cancer and my PIRAD score was 5. He ordered another biopsy with 16 snips, including the anterior zone and it produced a Gleason score of 3+4 which led to a RP in April 2018. Post surgery my Gleason was a 4+3 and while my PSA after surgery was undetectable < .008, it slowly started to rise and after a PSMA-PET scan in January 2022 I had salvage radiation with two shots of Zoladex. The good news is that my PSA post SRT is still undetectable. While I continue to suffer from incontinence and my bowel movements post SRT have deteriorated; I can live with that. My testosterone level is still extremely low but I am okay with living with one diaper and a pad per day. In the meantime, at age 81, I still participate in my twice weekly exercise class and I am still golfing, playing squash and I am getting ready for another ski season on Whistler Blackcomb.

REPLY
@jrobitai

JMHO A PSA of 7 is pretty low, esp at 72yrs. IDK about your insurance costs but I would definately recommend MRI over a biopsy.

True a biopsy is the only way to 'know', but a (3D) MRI (w/contrast) much less traumatic (too me) and will give you an idea of the extent of 'weirdness'

In fact the MRI results can be used to guide the biopsy if you go that route. If you do opt for a biopsy I found the bang-for-buck being in-office with nitrous. It cost me $80 but much less 'uncomfortable' than 'numbing' and waaay less expensive / time consuming than anesthesia.

I met w/a very renown urologist who said he never saw anyone "die from prostate cancer". IDK if I understood this correctly but I think his point was, in some cases, the treatment can be worse than not doing anything.

If I understand correctly, obviously some cancers metastasize and kill - maybe it's not prostate cancer at that point?

IDK

I am going to clear this up soon and if you care will share the clarification

Jump to this post

Your story about the urologist of renown reminds me that when my father was actually hospitalized for the final time with metastatic lung cancer, his cancer doctor never showed up in the hospital. Perhaps the urologist of renown could consider a similar strategy?

From cancer.org "Prostate cancer is the second leading cause of cancer death in American men, behind only lung cancer. About 1 man in 41 will die of prostate cancer. Prostate cancer can be a serious disease, but most men diagnosed with prostate cancer do not die from it."

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6497009/ "Prostate cancer is the second most frequent cancer diagnosis made in men and the fifth leading cause of death worldwide...."

REPLY
@spino

Your story about the urologist of renown reminds me that when my father was actually hospitalized for the final time with metastatic lung cancer, his cancer doctor never showed up in the hospital. Perhaps the urologist of renown could consider a similar strategy?

From cancer.org "Prostate cancer is the second leading cause of cancer death in American men, behind only lung cancer. About 1 man in 41 will die of prostate cancer. Prostate cancer can be a serious disease, but most men diagnosed with prostate cancer do not die from it."

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6497009/ "Prostate cancer is the second most frequent cancer diagnosis made in men and the fifth leading cause of death worldwide...."

Jump to this post

Yea, hard to argue those fact but I thought I was clear - IDK if I heard correctly & am planning to clarify.

There are very different types of prostate cancer, really aggressive to slow growing.

The point is the gent's 72 w/a 7.x PSA prob isn't a reason to freak out, rather to weigh things out.

REPLY
@gkm

I was diagnosed in 2016 as a result of a biopsy with a Gleason of 3+3. I had 3 more biopsies over the next couple of years. My urologist had resisted ordering a MRI as he wasn't comfortable as to their effectiveness. However, i 2018 he felt that the quality of the MRI's had improved. The MRI showed suspicious cancer in the anterior zone of the prostate which is not the normal location of the cancer and my PIRAD score was 5. He ordered another biopsy with 16 snips, including the anterior zone and it produced a Gleason score of 3+4 which led to a RP in April 2018. Post surgery my Gleason was a 4+3 and while my PSA after surgery was undetectable < .008, it slowly started to rise and after a PSMA-PET scan in January 2022 I had salvage radiation with two shots of Zoladex. The good news is that my PSA post SRT is still undetectable. While I continue to suffer from incontinence and my bowel movements post SRT have deteriorated; I can live with that. My testosterone level is still extremely low but I am okay with living with one diaper and a pad per day. In the meantime, at age 81, I still participate in my twice weekly exercise class and I am still golfing, playing squash and I am getting ready for another ski season on Whistler Blackcomb.

Jump to this post

Thank you for sharing your story. It encourages me to stay positive for hopeful outcomes. Best wishes to you in your road ahead and on the Whistler slopes! I live in Atlanta now but enjoyed the times earlier in my life when skiing out West in Colorado and California. I have Peripheral Neuropathy since 2008, so cold and snow don't pair well with my PN. Perhaps I'll explore some high-tech products that could enable me keep my numb toes warm enough to take on a few downhill runs again. I'll dream of gliding down that power in the Rockies again!

REPLY
@tgregg99

Thank you for sharing your story. It encourages me to stay positive for hopeful outcomes. Best wishes to you in your road ahead and on the Whistler slopes! I live in Atlanta now but enjoyed the times earlier in my life when skiing out West in Colorado and California. I have Peripheral Neuropathy since 2008, so cold and snow don't pair well with my PN. Perhaps I'll explore some high-tech products that could enable me keep my numb toes warm enough to take on a few downhill runs again. I'll dream of gliding down that power in the Rockies again!

Jump to this post

My MRI was a piece of cake; far easier to deal with than the biopsies.

REPLY
@jrobitai

Yea, hard to argue those fact but I thought I was clear - IDK if I heard correctly & am planning to clarify.

There are very different types of prostate cancer, really aggressive to slow growing.

The point is the gent's 72 w/a 7.x PSA prob isn't a reason to freak out, rather to weigh things out.

Jump to this post

No, I won't freak out ... I'm dealing with what I need to do. I had no issues when I was diagnosed with melanoma and was very fortunate to have a positive outcome. It was caught and treated early, and I had good doctors, etc. My lesson learned is that I become even more aware of taking care of myself when outdoors, not to be afraid of the sun but to be smart about it to reduce skin cancer risk. Yeah, I also read what you said about PC being slow growing but can be aggressive, thanks.

REPLY
Please sign in or register to post a reply.