← Return to Continue PSA surveillance or have a Prostate MRI?
DiscussionContinue PSA surveillance or have a Prostate MRI?
Prostate Cancer | Last Active: Oct 28, 2023 | Replies (42)Comment receiving replies
Replies to "JMHO A PSA of 7 is pretty low, esp at 72yrs. IDK about your insurance costs..."
Thanks very much! My doctor's advice with having the MRI and all the research I've read and comments received certainly make a strong case for having it. I'll keep your tip re: nitrous in mind, good one, may want to use it if allowable. I used it many years ago for a dental procedure, was effective.
Your story about the urologist of renown reminds me that when my father was actually hospitalized for the final time with metastatic lung cancer, his cancer doctor never showed up in the hospital. Perhaps the urologist of renown could consider a similar strategy?
From cancer.org "Prostate cancer is the second leading cause of cancer death in American men, behind only lung cancer. About 1 man in 41 will die of prostate cancer. Prostate cancer can be a serious disease, but most men diagnosed with prostate cancer do not die from it."
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6497009/ "Prostate cancer is the second most frequent cancer diagnosis made in men and the fifth leading cause of death worldwide...."
This is my understanding. All cancer cells have DNA. You can have prostate cancer in bones, lungs, etc. Despite where it is its still prostate cancer cells. Bone, lung cancer cells, etc have their own dna