← Return to Prostatectomy Question? Side effects outweigh benefits?

Discussion
Comment receiving replies
@michaelcharles

(Cut off; continuing)
undetectable (less than .1)
Post-op pathology confirmed Gleason 9, together with extra prostatic extension (EPE), meaning some cancer cells had gotten out of the prostate, but were found within the surgical boundary.
Proceeded with IMRT salvage radiation treatment to the entire pelvic region (WPRT) including pelvic lymph nodes, together with a short course of ADT , 4 mos Orgovyx.
Looking forward to a good PSA test in November.
Your questions: My lay person understanding is that the current trend is to not radiate immediately following surgery, wait for first PSA reading and then evaluate the status. Also, giving radiation a few months after surgery allows the pelvic region to recover first. It is believed that biochemical recurrence BCR) such as mine indicates residual cancer cells in the pelvic region. My PSMA PET scans did not identify cancer, so the pelvic region is the likely location for cancer cells that escaped the prostate.
Again, I would choose the same path at age 72, now 73.
Best wishes to you and everyone suffering from cancer.

Jump to this post


Replies to "(Cut off; continuing) undetectable (less than .1) Post-op pathology confirmed Gleason 9, together with extra prostatic..."

Thank you for your in-depth reply Michael, this is what I have been asking my surgeon but he says they don’t radiate after surgery. I just turned 56 by the way, so perhaps I may respond better if everything goes well with surgery but I feel young to have this happen. My feeling was that the treatment should be different based on my rare situation so I will consider my options and get a second opinion.

Wishing you all the best on your next follow up in November! I really appreciate your reply so thank you!