← Return to Difference between "PSA" versus "Screening PSA" ?
DiscussionDifference between "PSA" versus "Screening PSA" ?
Prostate Cancer | Last Active: Aug 14, 2023 | Replies (12)Comment receiving replies
Replies to "Hey @rockin2047 I see this has been sitting for a couple days. It may mean we..."
Yes, I have been diagnosed with PCa. Well this is interesting, I just checked my hotmail inbox where there is my Consultation Notes which have now been Updated showing a Screening PSA of 3.0 ng/ml which is correct. The takeaway is to be alert and detailed concerning any reports and lab results where there may be questions or possible errors.
At this time I'm narrowing down my treatment options between Viewray MRdian versus CyberKnife radiation approaches. Even though my Decipher test result was 0.37 Low Risk, I do have a family history of various cancers including my dad who died of PCa because it was diagnosed too late. One tumor I have is (3+4=7 Gleason). While Active Surveillance(AS) is very tempting, I don't want it to evolve into a 4+3=7 tumor. In the U.S., "about 60% of low-risk patients choose monitoring, now called active surveillance" according to this report: Study finds prostate cancer treatment can wait for most men https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/study-finds-prostate-cancer-treatment-can-wait-men-rcna74512