← Return to Recurrent episodes of intense symptoms with no answers - I Need Help

Discussion
Comment receiving replies
@skizzard

My hands are still when not moving/held still in the air but they shake pretty aggressively when I try to move them, especially when trying to hold something or grab something. She watched me move my hands up and down. I also told her that I'd had numbness in my fingertip that has now turned to pain and it makes touching anything with that hand difficult. I've also been having some coordination problems where I miss things I'm trying to grab, that sort of stuff.

I am hoping so too! I asked if she wanted me to write down my symptoms so she could attach the file to the referral but she said she'd send my bloodwork and to keep the list for my meeting with the neuro. I think she said she's planning on writing down what I told her in the referral. I don't remember too well!

Jump to this post


Replies to "My hands are still when not moving/held still in the air but they shake pretty aggressively..."

From your description, which you want to highlight when giving the neuro your history, your tremors sound like active, not passive, tremors. Passive tremors--i.e., when, say, the hand is at rest--are associated with Parkinson's; active tremors--e.g., when trying to hold a glass of iced tea at arm's length--are often associated with essential tremors. I had nonParkinson's tremors, which may or may not have qualified as essential tremors, and they disappeared after a one-yr course of propranolol.

I get your concern about how to present to the neuro. It's a stressful transaction. Optimally, you give the neuro the facts, and the neuro analyzes them, diagnoses your condition, develops a treatment plan, and executes the treatment plan.
There's a lot of play on the neuro's side of things, so it's understandable that you may want to go beyond merely providing the facts.

Several factors must guide your decision as to whether to do more than present the facts. Prob the most important are the neuro's competence and enthusiasm. Without both, the neuro may need a nudge--sometimes, more than a nudge. At one time, you may have had a choice among neuros, but, where I live, finding a neuro is like finding an obstetrician in Idaho.

Other factors are impt. A recurring referral source, such as a nearby primary care dr or hospital, helps a lot, as the neuro doesn't want to lose future business. On a related note, how busy is the neuro at present? And how urgent are your needs?

It's a tough puzzle to solve. You can stay in your lane and hope for the best or you can go for the gold by "oversharing" with your analysis, rule-out diagnoses, and treatment parameters, even plans! I tend to wander out of my lane, at least to the extent of some analysis, but try to stay on the roadway by going no further. At the end of the day, I'd rather be frustrated that the neuro fired me than if I stuck to a presentation of the facts and got little or nothing in return. Better to have tried and failed?