← Return to Is "tree in bud " nodularity serious?

Discussion

Is "tree in bud " nodularity serious?

MAC & Bronchiectasis | Last Active: Mar 5 8:15pm | Replies (38)

Comment receiving replies
@rchildress

That is interesting because my CT also mentioned tree in bud but no one has mentioned that to me. Just concerned about infection. Now I know to address this with the new pulmonologist on the 26th.
Thank you for mentioning this. I would not have known to ask about it.

Jump to this post


Replies to "That is interesting because my CT also mentioned tree in bud but no one has mentioned..."

and @leilam Just wanted to repeat, for everyone, that not every radiologist is an expert in lung diseases and/or conditions. And most do not have access to your complete medical record.
The language the radiologist uses to report to the ordering physician is their medical "dialect" for lack of a better term. The radiologist says "tree in bud", "ground glass opacities", "fibrotic changes", etc and what areas are infected. If they are experienced, and certain features jump out at them, they may add "characteristic of NTM" or "indicative of bronchiectasis".
The pulmonologist takes both the CT images and the description, along with their knowledge of your condition, and figures out a diagnosis. If the conclusion is still uncertain, they may consult with other professionals or order additional tests.

That is why it is important to take a step back and have a conversation with your doc after seeing the reports on your patient portal. Jumping to "Dr Google" can lead to extra anxiety. Maybe just a phone call can tell you if the doc feels it is necessary to move forward sooner.
Sue