← Return to How did you choose between proton or photon radiation?

Discussion
Comment receiving replies
@waynen

You are right that the studies show same results for both types. My concern was the possibility of future issues from photon. I understand the newer photon machines that can skirt organs to the prostrate. The disadvantage of the proton is the equipment and facilities needed to produce the protons. We had a place near the Phoenix site, but a number of guys had to travel and find lodging. They also have 5 treatments for a number of patients. They were just testing it when I was tested. I had 20 sessions which was the fewest then. The amount of the radiation is the same regardless of the number of treatments.
For the first 3 years I had follow up every 6 months and yearly since then. My PSA was negligible each year. Glad you are able to exercise. It makes it better for you. My Gleason was an 8 and high risk, and now have been cancer free and feel good and active at 78.

Jump to this post


Replies to "You are right that the studies show same results for both types. My concern was the..."

waymen, thanks for information. I am 77 and plan to be around a lot of years. I too chose to limit the possibility of future issues that photon would have. Mayo Jacksonville does use a new photon machine but the photon radiation still does pass through body.

I was reading that research is showing that the high dose radiation treatments (5) are having more secondary side affects issues than the long dose (20-30). UFPTI where I had my proton done received a 25 million dollar federal grant to do long term research on proton and photo secondary cancer and long term side affects. Right now all research has been 5 year.