Starting Proton Treatments for Prostate Cancer: Any experiences?
I am 69, just been diagnosed with prostate cancer, Gleason score of 3 + 4, PSA is 4.2. I have opted to do 28 treatments of proton radiation only. I would appreciate hearing from others who have been through this and how it worked out for you. Thanks in advance!
Interested in more discussions like this? Go to the Prostate Cancer Support Group.
You decide how many. Originally they wanted 28 proton treatments for me but the minute I talked about CyberKnife needing only 5 all of a sudden "we can do 5". Think about it. How much do hospitals make on 28 treatments vs 5? Of course they want you to take more.
I am 74. Had a 7mm lesion confined to the prostate on a PSMA Pet scan. PSA 2.9 and had been in the mid 2's for 5 years. MRI fusion TP biopsy showed 3-4 in 2 cores and 4-3 in two cores out of 30 cores taken in my 120 gm prostate. I finished a 5 session Proton radiation treatment on April 26, 2023. The only trouble I had was after the 2nd session. After the 1st session I got out to the car to drive home and drank my mug of coffee and when I got home, I finished the pot. I did the same thing after the 2nd session even though everything I read said to avoid caffeine. I must say my bladder agreed with that suggestion whole heartedly. I had urgency issues about every 15 minutes even if I barely had to urinate. Needless to say I avoided my coffee for about a week after my last session and I am fine now. I had a little pinkish discharge for a few days like a wet fart before having my morning bowel movement. I almost wonder if they actually gave me enough radiation as I was prepared for side effects that never appeared. What the future holds who knows but I did get the SpaceOar Gel inserted also. Best of luck to you.
@rockin2047 , I think I was fortunate because the only side effect I experienced during treatment was urgency to urinate, but as I recall it was only during the first couple of weeks of treatment (after that ... no urgency experienced). I experienced no bowel or rectum issues (I had SpaceOAR) and no ED issue. During each weekly consult with my oncologist, he seemed really pleased that I wasn't experiencing other common urinary difficulties (e.g., hesitation, dribbling, weak stream, incomplete bladder emptying), painful urination, or frequency of urinating. In speaking to a few other guys who were being treated during the same timeframe, it seems that their urinary difficulties were successfully treated with Flomax pills. Also, keep in mind that I didn't have SBRT so my experience (lower radiation doses over longer timeframe) may not be a good indicator for you.
Thanks for the quick reply. Regarding the placement of the carbon markers, I had read that they would be gold markers not carbon. Isn't carbon toxic to the body? At least with gold ones they're worth about $2,000 per oz and could help to pay for a lot of Depends !! In the case of Brachytherapy "small, completely dissolvable radioactive beads (coated in Titanium) are implanted around the entire prostate area. This therapy targets the affected area more specifically than IMRT and other external radiation therapies, resulting in a shorter treatment time and, often, fewer side effects. Within one to four weeks, depending on what type of seed we use, treatment is done,” Dr. Runz said. “There is no need for the seeds to be removed.” I had a transperineal biopsy performed using "micro ultrasound" which is the latest thing and much better images than standard ultrasound. It was actually able to find a third lesion as opposed to only two detected by the MRI. The one Gleason 7 tissue sample was sent out for a Decipher test which I highly recommend your friend request which Medicare will pay for. It examines the DNA of his cancer cells and makes a risk assessment as to whether he is at Low Risk, Interm Risk or High Risk. Mine was Low Risk at 0.37 where they said I was a good candidate for Active Surveillance(AS) or local radiation. Since my dad died of PC I don't want to end up like him. Regarding AS make sure your friend reads the report on the NBC TV website. Use the following search phrase "Study finds prostate cancer treatment can wait for most men." This long term study (started in 1999) was released March 11, 2023 and involved 1,600 U.K. men. It concluded that there was no difference in PC death at 15 years between the 3 groups. Survival for all three groups was 97%. regardless of treatment approach. These findings do not apply to men with high-risk or more advanced disease who need urgent treatment. If I and your friend choose AS, it may be possible in just a few years to benefit from the new field of "radiopharmaceuticals." This will be a game changer. Use the following search phrase "Cambridge biotech raises $90 million for drug that uses radioactive atoms to fight prostate cancer." My plan is to get a second oncologist's opinion and then decide what to do, either AS or 5 Proton Beam treatments using the CyberKnife robotic arm approach. One website said that 5 Proton Beam treatments using a higher dose of radiation was found to result in much lower cases of PC recurrence as compared to 20 to 30 low doses over 6 to 8 weeks. Thanks for your info since I learned a few more things. What are your thoughts? Tell your friend to read about the experience @bjroc has had regarding using AS dated May 15, 2023. This is exactly what I fear, things just start to go South without warning. As my first oncologist said to me "Radiation is the price you pay for insurance."
If everybody researched PC as thoroughly as you I believe there would be far fewer RPs and many fewer sleepless nights. Worth a read is "Invasion of the Prostate Gland Snatchers", by Scholz and Blum. I chose the insurance policy of 5 dose Proton SBRT but my urologist would have gladly performed RP.
Cheers.
That was the first urologist I was assigned to. The minute I told him I was not interested in surgery he dropped me like a hot rock. He practically dragged me out of the exam room and took me to scheduling for the radiation oncologist. 5 proton treatments later and so glad I did.
I am in your shoes. Just started proton radiation treatment. Had normal PSA but rising fast and biopsy showed low risk, 4+3=7. I chose Proton reading that it was best for reducing damage to other organs and tissues.
I had a lot of back and forth with urologist and oncologist/radiologist which was better and it was not pleasant or the care I thought should be provided.
I have had 4 treatments so far and not side affects. I am told if have them will be starting end of week 2 or 3. Hope I don't but won't be surprised if I do. The prepeartions to start the therapy biopsies, PET scan, bone scan, markers, space/oar were far more an issue than treatment. The treatments are so fast I wonder if doing all. The only issue so far is drinking the water to get bladder out of way and worrying about having to pee. So far so good.
GOOD LUCK TO YOU!
Wow. Thank you for so much information. I too had the Decipher and I was intermediate then after it I was low risk. I was still told to do cure radiation treatment.
I had to deal with radiologist/oncologist trying to say Proton was not worth it nor any difference. My research showed that it does provide a lessor degree of damage to other organs and tissue. Most research was over 5 years so they don't know long term so a lot of disagreements. Had even one urologist say would not see me after my treatments were over if had proton radiation at another provider who did proton radiation.
Hi jc76, I met with my urologist and oncologist at one highly regarded hospital in a large metro area. The oncologist discussed Active Surveillance (AS), Brachytherapy and 5 Proton Beam(PB) treatments. He was Extremely unwilling to suggest one of these or any others (law suit ??). Since I'm very concerned with the "possible" side effects of the 5 Proton Beam treatments, I am in the process of scheduling a second opinion appointment with an oncologist at a nearby major hospital. The question is will any of these possible side effects be temporary or long term? The issue I have with Brachytherapy is that the radioactive seeds are seemingly placed throughout the entire prostate and not just next to the tumor/s thereby giving radiation to the whole prostate (I think). Also, the placement of the seeds totally depends on the skill of the doctor. However, the PB approach targets the tumor, BUT does not result in an "exit dose" of radiation outside of the tumor. I can understand why your urologist would not want to see you after PB treatments. My first oncologist is at a hospital that offers PB treatments while the oncologist for the 2nd opinion is at a hospital that offers CyberKnife which uses x-rays or photons. So, if I choose hospital A I won't be relying on any of the medical staff at hospital B. Please keep me informed about any side effects you encounter and what your doctor says about them.
Cyber knife uses high doses of radiation as opposed to Proton therapy which has potentially more risk to healthy tissues around the prostate. That’s why it only uses 5 doses. I opted for Proton therapy, much less risk of collateral damage to bladder, urethra, rectum, etc. I don’t believe it’s a money issue, but a safety issue. Do more research before deciding the quicker route.