← Return to Extremely high calcium score at 42 - is there any positive here??

Discussion
Comment receiving replies
@degarden_girl

I am 78 YO female. Because my cholesterol was in the high normal range, in 2007 my cardio sent me for a CAC just to assure there was no calcified plaque. We were both shocked when it came back in the mid 500 range. I immediately went on a statin and removed all eggs, red meat, butter from my diet. I wasn't able to tolerate statins so was without them for several years until Pralulent was approved for reducing cholesterol and heart attacks. Fast forward maybe 5 years and I developed left arm pain with minimal exercise. Into the hospital and received two stents. I am back at the gym, doing vigorous exercise. I must continue to watch my diet and use the Pralulent but I'm doing fine. My father died of his one and only heart attack at age 50 (in 1962 before all these advanced cardio testings were available) so I feel fortunate to have made it to this age. My Mom had by-pass surgery when she was 79 so I am glad I didn't have to go that route.

I am one of 7 children and two of us have calcium scores above zero. I guess we got the problematic cardio genes. And we can't beat ourselves up about this. Only 25% of cholesterol is from diet. The remainder is made by the liver. And cholesterol is different in different people. One sister has cholesterol of over 300 and a zero CAC score. I have an abundance of LPa (L P little a) which is a low density lipoprotein with a little tail on it which burrows into the artery wall. She has light and fluffy LDL which just floats through her blood stream. It is indeed genetic.

Steveny, I understand that you are feeling heartsick and betrayed by your body. If you hadn't already been taking such good care of your body I think you would be in a far worse situation. I suggest you see a nutritionist to discuss healthy eating choices and then just know you are doing everything you can to keep your heart healthy.

Do you know where your calcified plaque is located? Some arteries are of less concern than others.

I wish you peace and good health.

Donna

Jump to this post


Replies to "I am 78 YO female. Because my cholesterol was in the high normal range, in 2007..."

Yes, I know all three. Here are the results:

LEFT ANTERIOR DESCENDING:
Type: I
Proximal, Mid: few mixed plaques in the proximal - mid segment of LAD causing mild stenosis (25-29% luminal narrowing)
Distal: normal
Diagonals: small D1 normal, D2 normal
D3: small calcific plaque in the proximal segment of D3 without significant stenosis
LEFT CIRCUMFLEX:
Proximal: few calcific plaques in the proximal segment of LCx causing minimal stenosis (1-24% luminal narrowing) Distal: normal
Obtuse marginals: OM1 normal
RIGHT CORONARY:
Proximal: calcific plaque in the proximal segment of RCA causing minimal stenosis (1-24% luminal narrowing) Mid: mixed plaque in the mid segment of RCA causing minimal stenosis (1-24% luminal narrowing)
Distal: normal
Posterior descending: normal
Posterolateral ventricular branch: normal