SpaceOAR causing issues
I just spoke with my urologist today and he indicated that the hospital affiliated with his practice is no longer using SpaceOAR. Doctors in various parts of the country have seen complications. I attempted proton therapy last summer at Sibley Hospital and had the spaceOAR inserted. I for whatever reason got a horrible infection two weeks after it was inserted. I presumed it was a bad insertion by the doctor who was affiliated with Sibley (not my urologist here in Pittsburgh). So my advice to others who are not aware of this development, discuss this information with your doctor. My urologist as recently as December, 2022 was a proponent of spaceOAR and now he will not do it.
Interested in more discussions like this? Go to the Prostate Cancer Support Group.
Had SpaceOar inserted by radiologist before proton therapy .Local anesthetic used and only minor discomfort during procedure. No issues at all; procedure performed eleven months ago.
My ulcer was not healed after four months. I will schedule another check in the next two months. I had a colonsocpy in October and they saw the ulcer after I requested they report back to me on that. They took a biopsy and it was negative.
I would guess you had a transrectal biopsy with your comments about the needles where your wife has not gone. I had a transperineal biopsy and it was not bad as they numbed me very well. I plan on getting the SpaceOar at Mayo Phoenix as I have a very large prostate.
Mike, Sorry, this is a thread on preparing for radiation treatment of an intact prostate already diagnosed with prostate cancer. Nothing to do with biopsies.
My biopsy was also negative from both sigmoidoscopies I had. Sorry your ulcer has not healed. My ulcer healed after 04 months. We both fall into the failed category for the SpaceAOR gel.
drj, I think Mike was suggesting the possibility that the infection might have come from a transrectal biopsy vs transperineal biopsy rather that the hydryogel/SpaceOar insertion. Might be somewhat clearer if imbimbo had mentioned the time spread between biopsy and treatment.
I had perineal. Two weeks after it was inserted I had the symptoms of an infection but the doctors did not diagnose it until a full month after the infection started. I never started radiation
Just for clarity in the comments: there are needle biopsies, and there are needle hydrogel placement. The real estate is usually quite different. I believe most prostate biopsies are transrectal. The biopsies are then used to make the diagnosis and inform potential treatments.
Once the decision is to treat by radiation, some people precede that radiation by a couple of weeks with hydrogel insertion to minimize radiation damage to the colon, etc. Hydrogel placement is with an injection by an ultrasound guided needle in the area between the scrotum and the anus. This area is also known as the perineum. Numbing of the area immediately before the insertion was done by three injections.
It may be possible to do perineal biopsies of the prostate, it's just that I'm not aware of any.
I had two biopsies : one to confirm cancer and the second was a biopsy of the ulcer in my rectum caused by the hydrogel insertion. The rectal biopsy was done during a colonoscopy and had nothing to do with the prostate biopsy
Thanks for that added information.
It's my own speculation, but here's something I wrote previously: "How do you do stick a needle there without damaging prostate, rectum, etc.? ". In other words, even when ultrasound guided, positioning a long sharp needle in that small space has to have some risk associated with it, like nicking something you want to avoid.
I would note that hydrogel itself worked well for me. I would recommend it. It's the placement of it that's tricky. So is would suggest that the "prostatectomy rule" applies: don't go with a surgeon who only does one radical prostatectomy a month. Same with hydrogel placement.