Prostate cancer surgery: What can I expect & prepare for?
48 about to have prostate removal surgery
Just needing some advice or experiences of survivors of this, what to expect and what to prepare for.
Interested in more discussions like this? Go to the Prostate Cancer Support Group.
Thanks for sharing this detailed information, and especially for giving me your surgeon’s name. I’m 55 years old by the way. Because I’m at a level of Gleason 6 and a low percentage based on the biopsy, my urologist is suggesting active surveillance. He scheduled an MRI for March of next year, but I asked why we would wait 6 months to get a better understanding of what we’re dealing with. So we rescheduled for next week to get the MRI. I think I’m going to send the results to the Mayo Clinic to get their opinion. I live in Atlanta, so Jacksonville would not be bad from a geographical standpoint, but I’d be willing to travel anywhere to ensure I have the best surgeon assuming I choose to go with RP at some point.
Thanks again!
I have had recurrence with a negative margin path, the issue with me was even though the margins can be clear, there can be Lymphovascular invasion which is what I had.
They did removed the right pelvic lymph node (as most of the cancer was on the right side of the prostate) and that tested negative.
About 9 mos after surgery my PSA started to rise again and I went for Salvage Radiation Therapy. Waiting on second PSA test after that which will be next week.
Thanks for the link, looks like might be a good option. Also good to know that the pain may take a few months to gradually settle as then don’t have the expectation should be fine in a week. Thanks 🙂
Thank for the advice 🙂 He was applying ice packs to his incision region but didn’t think to apply to the area painful when sitting. Trying that now 🙂
Being the same age (just turned 56), I would be very concerned with a doctor that recommends active surveillance for Gleason 6 prostate cancer. From the research I have done, at your "young age" for prostate cancer, more aggressive treatment would be recommended. I read a paper from Johns Hopkins that showed Gleason 6 patients that have a radical prostatectomy are for the most part "cured". When I found that I had prostate cancer, I was praying for Gleason 6 (3/3). Unfortunately, my biopsy found that I had Gleason 7 (4/3). Either way, I knew that a radical prostatectomy was the way to go for me (lower age, good physical condition, etc.). I have not done any research on Mayo-Jacksonville, but I did quite a bit on Mayo-Rochester and was extremely happy with RP outcome. If you chose Mayo-Rochester, there are a lot of house/condo rentals - We were able to find a very nice condo (only a few years old), 4 blocks from the Methodist campus, for a very reasonable cost. We ended up staying two week, just in case there were any complications (no complications but highly recommend this).
BTW, just got my final pathology back - Awesome news, all negative margins, cancer contained within the prostate and lymph nodes & seminal vesicles clear. The only bad news was that they did find Tertiary Pattern 5. This is an indicator of biochemical relapse in patients with Gleason score 7. Based on my situation, I would highly recommend getting a second opinion. For you, they found Gleason score 6 with the biopsy. Biopsies are a good indicator, but when they do the final pathology of the prostate/seminal vesicles/lymph nodes, they could find more advanced cancer. For me, mid-50's was far too young to let active cancer continue to grow in my body. The robotic radical prostatectomy was not a significant surgery for myself - First week was quite bad (catheter, referred gas pain, bowel movements), but after the catheter is out, it is all about regaining your bladder control. This is a little bit inconvenient, but I just wear a low flow diaper expect this to go on for up to a year. Obviously, complications can occur, so you need to go into the surgery understanding all potential issues.
Good luck with your decision and please feel free to reach out if you have any questions about Mayo-Rochester or what to expect with the Radical Prostatectomy.
Thanks for sharing. Curious, did they take only one lymph node or several? Also, would you be willing to share your Gleason score? My pathology showed that all cancer was contained to the prostate and the six lymph nodes they removed were clear. The one negative was a minor tertiary Gleason pattern 5 that indicates a higher potential reoccurrence. Curious, did you have any tertiary Gleason pattern 5?
Hope you had a great Thanksgiving,
Jim
They just took the one, it was labeled "right pelvic lymph nodes" but the description of the sample was for one, it was negative.
Gleason was 4+3
The primary and secondary are spelled out but the word tertiary does not appear in the pathology report at all.
Thanks so much for the extra detail and pray all goes well for your follow up treatments. My doctor said told me that if my cancer comes back they would do scans to determine where the cancer is located. Did they find where your cancer came back or are they treating the prostate base?
After the RP the PSA went up to .09 and we did the PSMA PET CT Scan with radioactive dye, it was negative. I learned here that it's typically negative at that PSA level, until your up a bit more, the chances of the scan finding anything are pretty low.
So.. the radiation was the "surgical bed" I think they call it, and lymph nodes around the surgical bed for about the first 29 treatments, then the last bunch are just the surgical bed. (which I guess is the same as the prostate base).
If you click on the chart, you'll be able to see the entire thing. I have no idea why it looks like this...
Thanks for the additional detail, helps me understand what to expect if I have an increase in PSA going forward. Now that I have an example for the PSMA results, I will be investigating to understand this more. Sounds like your doctors are being very proactive in radiating the prostate base to ensure the cancer does not spread outside the prostate surroundings.
Have great week,
Jim