Rising PSA years after radical prostatectomy

Posted by olanordman @olanordman, Feb 22, 2021

I am 60 years and I had radical prostatectomy on 23rd Nov 2018. I was told out of the 15 lymph nodes taken only one was affected less than a millimetre. It was Gleason score 7B with PSA around 13 at time of surgery but 11 at time of diagnosis in June 2018.

The PSA been fluctuating between 0.09 and 0.18 since surgery on 23rd November 2018
I have no incontinence as well as Erectile dysfunction. I take hypertension medication – Norvask Amlodipine 5mg daily and Cetirizine 5mg for allergy. Below are some of the test results. I have many of these test results – a few below
Jan 2019: 0.11
April 2019: 0.11
June 2019: 0.09
August 2019: 0.12
December 2019: 0.12
April 2020: 0.12
August 2020: 0.11
October 2020: 0.17
December 2020: 0.15
February 2021: 0.18

I am worried the cancer may be returning or might have spread. I met my doctor today and expressed my concerns. He has agreed to refer me to the hospital where I had the surgery. Any suggestions based on this brief history?

Interested in more discussions like this? Go to the Prostate Cancer Support Group.

@web265

It's obviously an annoyance with regard to the way it's done, every weekday at the same time for 40 days (weekends and holidays off at my treatment center). Once you get fitted (tattooed, markers inserted if necessary) it only takes about 5-7 minutes to get the treatment. The issue here is they wan't your bladder "as full as you can stand it while still being able to stay still on the treatment table." It can take a little trial and error to figure out how much water to drink and how long before treatment. Mine was 24-28 ounces one hour before.

Side effects... different for everyone, mine were VERY minor I'm told...
At first it was actually hard to notice anything different, then by about #13/15 I started to get digestive changes/symptoms. I'm a "one a day guy" normally. Then the treatments seemed to aggravate my bowels somewhat to a point where it often took a couple bowel movements before I felt emptied. My anus seemed to be sore as well. There were maybe 3 or 4 bouts of diarrhea that I couldn't otherwise explain too. By about treatment 3O I experienced some fatigue issues, particularly a few hours after treatment (mine was at 9:20 AM). I found it took a herculean effort to get through workouts too. My normal 2 mile run was really tough to get through.

Now at one and a half weeks after ending, I can already feel the difference in energy levels, soar through the runs again and don't have to struggle to end the workout. Getting through the days with no naps again as well.

Really, the only reminder at this point, is the occasional hot flash from the orgovyx. It feels like those are becoming less frequent as well. It seemed daunting when getting ready to start of course, but, now it feels like it all went pretty quickly.

Good Luck to You!

Jump to this post

I am six months post RP and my PSA jumped from "undetectable" 3 months ago to 0.51 today. Waiting to speak with my urologist. I assume scans and radiation are in my future but I'm seeking advice and suggestions from others who have been here before me.

REPLY
@edo

I am six months post RP and my PSA jumped from "undetectable" 3 months ago to 0.51 today. Waiting to speak with my urologist. I assume scans and radiation are in my future but I'm seeking advice and suggestions from others who have been here before me.

Jump to this post

I would think scans, SRT radiation and they will likely suggest ADT therapy as well. My jump in PSA percentage wise was very similar to yours.

I wish I could find the chart but I'm not having any luck. Someone posted a chart in here that showed a correlation between PSA level and positive results from a PSMA scan (meaning finding cancer). I had the scan but none was found. (my PSA level was only .091 at the time, but rising quickly) Maybe this will trigger a repost 🙂

I'll tell you that I was dreading getting this treatment, but, it really went by rather quickly and I was lucky to not have side effects that were too bad. If this is the route you take, hopefully you'll have a similar experience.

If I may, how do you define undetectable when taking the ultra-sensitive PSA Test?

REPLY
@web265

I would think scans, SRT radiation and they will likely suggest ADT therapy as well. My jump in PSA percentage wise was very similar to yours.

I wish I could find the chart but I'm not having any luck. Someone posted a chart in here that showed a correlation between PSA level and positive results from a PSMA scan (meaning finding cancer). I had the scan but none was found. (my PSA level was only .091 at the time, but rising quickly) Maybe this will trigger a repost 🙂

I'll tell you that I was dreading getting this treatment, but, it really went by rather quickly and I was lucky to not have side effects that were too bad. If this is the route you take, hopefully you'll have a similar experience.

If I may, how do you define undetectable when taking the ultra-sensitive PSA Test?

Jump to this post

Thank you web265 for your response. I appreciate you sharing your salvage radiation experience. I suspect I will follow a similar path and hope the side effects are not too bad. What is your PSA now? As for my undetectable PSA, all I can say is that it was <0.01.

REPLY
@edo

Thank you web265 for your response. I appreciate you sharing your salvage radiation experience. I suspect I will follow a similar path and hope the side effects are not too bad. What is your PSA now? As for my undetectable PSA, all I can say is that it was <0.01.

Jump to this post

Thanks for the clarification "undetectable" seems to mean somewhat different things to different folks i.e. drs, govt, labs etc.

My PSA went from .091 at the start of radiation and ADT to .014 one week after end of radiation treatments. They usually wait three mos for that test at my RO's office but I needed it for a different unconnected physical exam.

REPLY

I had a radical prostatectomy 1 year ago. At 6 months post surgery my PSA was <0.04. Today (same lab) the result is 0.04. I realize this is still not a cause for concern, but does it represent a true, if minor, increase? What is the margin of error in the test itself?

REPLY
@ssonkin

I had a radical prostatectomy 1 year ago. At 6 months post surgery my PSA was <0.04. Today (same lab) the result is 0.04. I realize this is still not a cause for concern, but does it represent a true, if minor, increase? What is the margin of error in the test itself?

Jump to this post

I would suggest the answer to that is no. There are so many little things that can effect your PSA level that I wouldn't think that less than .009 max of a change is significant. What would be more important is to see if there is a significant trend come the next one. Even then if it's that small of an increase again, I still wouldn't be too concerned.

REPLY
@ssonkin

I had a radical prostatectomy 1 year ago. At 6 months post surgery my PSA was <0.04. Today (same lab) the result is 0.04. I realize this is still not a cause for concern, but does it represent a true, if minor, increase? What is the margin of error in the test itself?

Jump to this post

Its a minor change Yet ask oncologist if you should be on Zolodex Testosterone is the fertilizer of PC After 5 years since radiation cancer metastases to my L2 lumber which I had nuked a year ago with intense rad

Microscopic stuff floats around to kill off us old males Im 78 feel great but PSA 1.2 for years now 4.22

REPLY

Hi - I am not a doctor. My situation has some similarities to yours. My PSA has gone up and down over the last 4 years or so after a RALP. You may want to check this out: https://prostatecancerinfolink.net/2015/01/14/low-detectable-psa-after-prostatectomy-watch-or-treat/

My most recent PSA was .07. It had been rising to .11, then it has been coming down since then. I have decided that if it does start rising and does so steadily, I will probably wait until it is .5 or so and then get a PSMA or similar scan to see if anything is found.

Best Regards

REPLY

Hi
I underwent a Robotic-assisted Radical Prostatectomy on 15-Feb-2022 at UHN Canada. Surgical pathology on 15-Feb-2022 revealed adenocarcinoma, Gleason: 8 (3 + 5), and negative surgical margin involvement status. The disease was pathologically staged as T3a N1.

PSA RESULT
- PSA on 01-Apr-2022 (Total PSA is 0.017 ug/L).
- PSA on 12-Oct-2022 (Total PSA is 0.075 ug/L).

My Pathology report after surgery shows as under. My PSMA -PET test did not detect the Lymph node before surgery.

DIAGNOSIS
1. Soft-Tissue: periprostatic tissue: Mature adipose tissue, no lymph nodes identified. Negative for malignancy

2. Right external iliac artery node: Three reactive lymph nodes, negative for malignancy

3. Right pelvic lymph node: Four reactive lymph nodes, negative for malignancy

4. Left pelvic lymph node: Metastatic adenocarcinoma (diam < 1 mm) in one of six lymph nodes.

5. Prostate and seminal vesicles, weight 28 grams:
- Predominantly right posterior peripheral zone localization of adenocarcinoma, Gleason score 8 (3 + 5) with a high-grade component, comprising 60% of the carcinoma
- Positive for intraductal carcinoma
- Positive for (focal) extraprostatic extension, negative for bladder neck invasion or seminal vesical invasion (pT3a)
- Surgical margins negative for malignancy
- About 9% of the prostate volume involved by carcinoma

COMMENT
Immunostaining performed to exclude neuroendocrine carcinoma component: Both chromogranin A and synaptophysin are negative, while the androgen receptor is intense nuclear positive. The basal cell staining (HMWCK) highlights the intraductal carcinoma
component.

SYNOPTIC DATA

Procedure: Radical prostatectomy:
Prostate Size
Prostate Weight (g): 28 g
TUMOR
Histologic Type: Acinar adenocarcinoma
Histologic Grade
Grade Group and Gleason Score: Grade Group 4 (Gleason Score 3 + 5 = 8)
Tertiary Pattern 5 (less than 5%) in Overall Gleason Score 7:
Present
Percentage of Pattern 4: 40 %
Percentage of Pattern 5: 20 %
Intraductal Carcinoma (IDC): Present
Cribriform Pattern: Present
Tumor Quantitation: Estimated percentage of prostate involved by tumor: 9 %
Extraprostatic Extension (EPE): Present, focal
Location of Extraprostatic Extension: Right posterior
Urinary Bladder Neck Invasion: Not identified
Seminal Vesicle Invasion: Not identified
Treatment Effect: No known presurgical therapy
Lymphovascular Invasion: Not Identified
Perineural Invasion: Present:
MARGINS
Margins: Uninvolved by invasive carcinoma
LYMPH NODES
Regional Lymph Nodes:
The number of Lymph Nodes Involved:
Number of Lymph Nodes Involved: 1
Size of Largest Metastatic Deposit (Centimeters):
0.1 cm
Number of Lymph Nodes Examined: 13
PATHOLOGIC STAGE CLASSIFICATION (pTNM, AJCC 8th Edition)
Primary Tumor (pT): pT3a
Regional Lymph Nodes (pN): pN1
ADDITIONAL FINDINGS
Additional Findings: None identified
SPECIAL STUDIES
Ancillary Studies: NGS prostate

Please can you tell me about the following?

1. is it curable after reoccurring?
2. Life expectancy rate: How many years can you survive?

Thanks

REPLY
@zj69

Hi
I underwent a Robotic-assisted Radical Prostatectomy on 15-Feb-2022 at UHN Canada. Surgical pathology on 15-Feb-2022 revealed adenocarcinoma, Gleason: 8 (3 + 5), and negative surgical margin involvement status. The disease was pathologically staged as T3a N1.

PSA RESULT
- PSA on 01-Apr-2022 (Total PSA is 0.017 ug/L).
- PSA on 12-Oct-2022 (Total PSA is 0.075 ug/L).

My Pathology report after surgery shows as under. My PSMA -PET test did not detect the Lymph node before surgery.

DIAGNOSIS
1. Soft-Tissue: periprostatic tissue: Mature adipose tissue, no lymph nodes identified. Negative for malignancy

2. Right external iliac artery node: Three reactive lymph nodes, negative for malignancy

3. Right pelvic lymph node: Four reactive lymph nodes, negative for malignancy

4. Left pelvic lymph node: Metastatic adenocarcinoma (diam < 1 mm) in one of six lymph nodes.

5. Prostate and seminal vesicles, weight 28 grams:
- Predominantly right posterior peripheral zone localization of adenocarcinoma, Gleason score 8 (3 + 5) with a high-grade component, comprising 60% of the carcinoma
- Positive for intraductal carcinoma
- Positive for (focal) extraprostatic extension, negative for bladder neck invasion or seminal vesical invasion (pT3a)
- Surgical margins negative for malignancy
- About 9% of the prostate volume involved by carcinoma

COMMENT
Immunostaining performed to exclude neuroendocrine carcinoma component: Both chromogranin A and synaptophysin are negative, while the androgen receptor is intense nuclear positive. The basal cell staining (HMWCK) highlights the intraductal carcinoma
component.

SYNOPTIC DATA

Procedure: Radical prostatectomy:
Prostate Size
Prostate Weight (g): 28 g
TUMOR
Histologic Type: Acinar adenocarcinoma
Histologic Grade
Grade Group and Gleason Score: Grade Group 4 (Gleason Score 3 + 5 = 8)
Tertiary Pattern 5 (less than 5%) in Overall Gleason Score 7:
Present
Percentage of Pattern 4: 40 %
Percentage of Pattern 5: 20 %
Intraductal Carcinoma (IDC): Present
Cribriform Pattern: Present
Tumor Quantitation: Estimated percentage of prostate involved by tumor: 9 %
Extraprostatic Extension (EPE): Present, focal
Location of Extraprostatic Extension: Right posterior
Urinary Bladder Neck Invasion: Not identified
Seminal Vesicle Invasion: Not identified
Treatment Effect: No known presurgical therapy
Lymphovascular Invasion: Not Identified
Perineural Invasion: Present:
MARGINS
Margins: Uninvolved by invasive carcinoma
LYMPH NODES
Regional Lymph Nodes:
The number of Lymph Nodes Involved:
Number of Lymph Nodes Involved: 1
Size of Largest Metastatic Deposit (Centimeters):
0.1 cm
Number of Lymph Nodes Examined: 13
PATHOLOGIC STAGE CLASSIFICATION (pTNM, AJCC 8th Edition)
Primary Tumor (pT): pT3a
Regional Lymph Nodes (pN): pN1
ADDITIONAL FINDINGS
Additional Findings: None identified
SPECIAL STUDIES
Ancillary Studies: NGS prostate

Please can you tell me about the following?

1. is it curable after reoccurring?
2. Life expectancy rate: How many years can you survive?

Thanks

Jump to this post

This is out of my league at the level of detail in this report, but, after my RP, my PSA went up to .091 from .039 and we started salvage radiation therapy. My path report was similar to yours but no detected invasion in lymph nodes. (Right pelvic was removed to testing during the RP as the cancer was mostly on the right side of the prostate)

Before starting SRT, I point blank asked the radiation oncologist, who generally likes to answer questions with a statistic, if this treatment was considered "curative"? His answer was "absolutely." The quote regarding the PSA from him was that rate of doubling is not as much of an indicator in these very low number levels.

There are those here, and at this point I'm inclined to agree with them at this point, who might suggest it may not be time to do anything till you get another PSA test, maybe do it in three months if it makes you feel better. There are reportedly a lot of things that can have an effect on PSA, particularly in those low number realms.

My surgeon advised aggressive treatment as that is his style and I did the SRT. I had very minor side effects which have ended (except for the orgovyx occasional hot flash (or power surge as my wife calls it ).

Next question to the radiation guy was what if this doesn't work? he gave me a sort of "we'll cross that bridge.." answer but added that I'd most likely pass with PC as opposed to from it.

Sorry to hear that you're going through this and best of luck to you!

REPLY
Please sign in or register to post a reply.