← Return to What are the Odds No Cancer Ever Returns After a radical prostatectomy
DiscussionWhat are the Odds No Cancer Ever Returns After a radical prostatectomy
Prostate Cancer | Last Active: Mar 31 1:28pm | Replies (33)Comment receiving replies
Replies to "It's a numbers game, as doctors don't have tests or scans that can examine every cell..."
I have reconsidered ADT (for borderline-Unfavorable Intermediate); starting to better understand the side-effects. They include e.g. (not sure how long it takes) collegenating the muscles involved in erections or turning them to fat; irreversible at the current state of the art. Which beats dying, and there are penile implants, IF that's the choice you are up against.
ADT is not something to choose casually, although the recurrence numbers are better. As with all the PCa therapies, over-treatment costs you.
This was a response early in my research, before I really understood that the treatments do damage as well. None of the options (including not getting treatment) are good (increase overall health or are fun) *as such*; however if you have Gleason 4 or above, usually treatment beats dying early in extreme pain. Unless something else is going to get you before the (usually slow) PCa does.
The goal is to spend wisely; get enough treatment, without over-treatment. And to keep monitoring for recurrence.
Thank you @mrscott I will listen to that and try and get some insight