← Return to Extremely high calcium score at 42 - is there any positive here??

Discussion
Comment receiving replies
@steveny

Greatly appreciate the perspective, especially given your first hand experience with Agatston.

Reading all of the lit that’s available on line on it is a deadening experience. Just one medical journal after another saying that the CAC score is:
* Peerlessly accurate and virtually never prone to error
* By far the strongest available predictor of future cardiac events - so strong that it will single handedly increase someone with an otherwise normal blood panel’s risk by a factor of 5x or 10x or even more depending on how high the score is

To read all of that and know that I have a 397 at 42 is just something I’m really struggling with. And to now be feeling absolutely wiped out by the statin that is supposed to help me here is putting my mind in darker places still.

Jump to this post


Replies to "Greatly appreciate the perspective, especially given your first hand experience with Agatston. Reading all of the..."

It's important to realize that the predictability of a cardiac event with a high CAC score is...only if you do nothing. No lifestyle changes, no meds.
Make the all changes, take the meds and the chances of a heart attack can go way down.

For what it's worth, I had a terrible problem with statins. My current cardiologist and I tried every one on the Markey and I has stunningly-painful leg cramps within a week of starting any in them, including micro doses. So I wouldn't be surprised if statins are affecting muscles and tendons. There are a few newer non-statin, anti-cholesterol drugs on the market that, purportedly, don't take a toll on the musculoskeletal system. And there are over-the-counter phytosterols that a lot of people have good experience with so there are statin alternatives. And diet can affect the kind and molecule-size of cholesterol as well. Lastly, I'm a firm believer in getting second, or even third for something life-saving, opinions. But keep focused on what you can do next so that 'paralysis by analysis' doesn't overwhelm.