← Return to "The HUM", a persistent Low Frequency Noise

Discussion

"The HUM", a persistent Low Frequency Noise

Hearing Loss | Last Active: Oct 23 6:07am | Replies (164)

Comment receiving replies
@bdurel

Yes. He said he didn't think it (or a bone anchored device) which bypasses the bad ear would be that beneficial to me. He said it helps only slightly with sound localization, doesn't reduce tinnitus, and doesn't help with filtering background noise or multiple voices. Whereas a cochlear implants uses the bad ear and would likely help me with my most troubling issues of SSHL. My husband wants me to get the Osia which is covered by Medicare but it's difficult to choose that when the specialist/surgeon says that if it were him he would only do the Cochlear Implant.

Jump to this post


Replies to "Yes. He said he didn't think it (or a bone anchored device) which bypasses the bad..."

Medicare often does cover single sided deafness for cochlear implants, but it may take some personal advocacy.

The CI manufacturers will go to bat for you if your medical team has determined that a CI would work well for you. I know, personally, that Cochlear Americas has had excellent results on this issue.

Who told you Medicare would not cover the CI procedure?