← Return to Extremely high calcium score at 42 - is there any positive here??

Discussion
Comment receiving replies
@callalloo

I don't know if fluffy, non-sticky, large molecule cholesterol would have an effect on current players or not. But it's better to have more of it than not, as I understand. I have chronically high cholesterol and the genetic marker for some heart disaster or other but cardio profiles always label me as giving A (optimal) profile. My former cardiologist attributes that good luck to the proportion of non-sticky cholesterol my body seems to make.

Jump to this post


Replies to "I don't know if fluffy, non-sticky, large molecule cholesterol would have an effect on current players..."

Interesting. I'm going to ask about this at my appointment tomorrow. It is interesting to look at these different indicators of disease/risk calculators. I entered my data into the Framingham score calculator today and it gave me a 1.8% chance of an incident in the next 10 years. I then used the MESA calculator -- which includes the CAC score, unlike Framingham -- and got 7.2%. So a four-fold increase basically just from adding in that CAC score.

Just out of curiosity, are you saying high cholesterol is you're only measurable indicator? Have you scored 0 on the CAC test?

That should read "on current plaque"...