Hi steveny,
So, my story is that I did a CAC test when I was 65 (68 now) just because they were inexpensive - no other reason. Since I have had moderately high blood pressure (completely controlled with irbesartan) for years, I had just started on atorvastatin. I have always - always - been higher than normal for glucose/A1C tests, but only a few pounds overweight - even during my 20 years as a Navy pilot. Total cholesterol always normal, but LDL towards higher range.
My score was 1352! So, in theory it was high when I was your age) - some folks note 10-15% per year increase as common. I was on vacation in Europe so didn't get the letter until I returned - about a month later.
In to see a cardiologist - had never seen one. He said, "you don't present as a heart patient" ... then stress test within a couple of days. METS 10.3 and 9 on the Duke rating with no ischemia. BTW, both my hips were replaced over the last 20 years - but no one can tell by the way I walk - just returned from another trip to Portugal where my wife and I carried backpacks and suitcases on public transportation, and logged 8-12 miles a day walking.
Also got updated blood work, and the statins were doing their thing - LDL and triglycerides dropped by half - both to around 50 and have remained in the 40-50 range since then. Total cholesterol 110-115.
Added vascepa to hopefully stabilize the plaque - no side effects from either vascepa or the statin.
My cardiologist was, as yours, rather matter of fact - following the first stress test, and confirming a few weeks ago - "We'll get another stress test in 2023."
Now, my negative sense is that the medical establishment really know their statistics and "standards of care" - and, given my complete lack of symptoms, and a very good stress test, they are on the fence about doing anything. Nonetheless, I am starting the push through my PCP to get some additional testing - this is usually a CT Angiogram (CTA).
Net - many folks probably have high CAC scores, and it is certainly agreed this is a marker, it may not indicate immediate danger ... unless one has additional medical factors.
You should, based on everything I've read, get a stress test. There should be metrics and an assessment from that to consider.
Appreciate this reply. It is striking to me how many of the stories I’ve seen here are like yours - folks in their 60s and 70s finding out they have 1,000+ scores. I’ve had the same thought that potentially they would have had a number like mine decades ago and that everyone’s is just going to go up with time no matter what (and apparently statin use will actually further raise the number by promoting calcification).
Anyway, I’m going to inquire about a stress test. I see that for many here it was the next step after getting a high score. Although I wonder if the scan my cardiologist is ordering — another calcium CT scan of the heart, but this time with due contest — will get us to the same place that a stress test would?
I’ve listened to my cardiologists’s voicemail many times this weekend. It’s just so bizarre to me to contrast his confident reassurance with everything I have digested online about these calcium scores - especially when the number is for someone my age and is so (relatively) high. It’s been an emotional roller coaster the last few days.