One weird point about FRAXL ratings. I entered exact data from recent DEXA scan and got those results. Then changed only my age, deducting 10 years and risk numbers fell by 50% while EVERY other variable remained the same. I'm suspecting the algorithm is assuming that age increased odds of falling? I did the same experiment, using correct data, but decided 10 pounds from my weight and all of the risk numbers increased! I'm guessing that result us based on some occult (non-obvious) assumption of inadequate diet or something? I'd be happy to lose those 10 pounds of remaining lockdown weight and doubt they're doing me any health good...

My point is that some of the standardized ratings that we're all measured against include assumptions that don't apply to us. And can be inappropriately discouraging.