← Return to Possible NET with No Evidence of Tumor: Mediastinal Mass
DiscussionPossible NET with No Evidence of Tumor: Mediastinal Mass
Neuroendocrine Tumors (NETs) | Last Active: Nov 2, 2021 | Replies (34)Comment receiving replies
Replies to "Just wanted to comment on this thread as I kind of had a similar experience. In..."
Hi Ava,
Thanks for adding your experience with Copper Cu 64 Dotatate (Detectnet). As you mentioned it was only recently approved by the FDA in Sept 2020.
Copper Cu 64 Dotatate has a high clinical sensitivity and specificity, which helps clinicians provide a more accurate treatment approach for NETs patients.
For anyone interested in learning more, here's information from Mayo Clinic and the FDA approval
- FDA Approves Copper Cu 64 Dotatate Injection for Somatostatin Receptor–Positive NETs https://www.onclive.com/view/fda-approves-copper-cu-64-dotatate-injection-for-somatostatin-receptor-positive-nets
- Copper Cu 64 Dotatate (Intravenous Route) https://www.mayoclinic.org/drugs-supplements/copper-cu-64-dotatate-intravenous-route/description/drg-20502439
May I ask what led your care team to order the Cu 64 test instead of gallium? Is it being used as the new standard where you receive care?
Hello @avawein
You posted about finding some"hotspots" on your liver after having a CU64 dotatate. I was wondering how you were doing. Do you have any biopsies or treatments planned for the future?
I look forward to hearing from you again. Will you post an update?