← Return to I seem to find myself between a rock and a hard place
DiscussionI seem to find myself between a rock and a hard place
Prostate Cancer | Last Active: Oct 19 11:30am | Replies (31)Comment receiving replies
Replies to "I was thinking about AREDS3 until I read the following: Major clinical studies, such as the..."
@diverjer
I am not a huge fan of mega-supplementation when the actual required dose can be derived from foods instead. My viewpoint is that supplement manufacturers use high dose formulations to deter people from getting the vitamins they need through dietary sources. They market 400 IU of a vitamin, a number far higher amount than the body will actually absorb or need for the intended theraputic purpose. Perhaps it is a form of marketing to imply that massive doses are required which exceed what can be obtained from regular dietary sources. One needs to convert IU to mg, research the actual theraputic requirement, factor in the percentage of the supplement lost to excretion due to factors like transport saturation from the digestive tract and the inhibition from dietary factors, phytic acid and zinc, for example, and then evaluate the bioavailability from food sources. It takes some effort, but so does dealing with an agressive recurrence.
Looking at the formulation of AREDS (the actual ingredients rather than just the IU of each vitamin), I would review the studies to determine the actual bioavailability of each ingredient. For example, with both zinc and vitamin E, the absorption rate drops to levels near, sometimes below, 50% due to mega dose transort mechanism saturation, a loss that doesn't occur with the lower dose of the vitamins from dietary sources. Other factors like decreased absorption due to competition/inhibition from diet, phytic acid/zinc for example, further reduce the number of mg actually available to and used by your body for the theraputic purpose. The end result might be that a small amount of supplement will be needed in addition to dietary sources, but the mega doses which may put us at risk of agressive/lethal progression are avoided. So you are on the right track with your efforts.
Several more links which you have likely already seen:
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5745505/
https://www.healio.com/clinical-guidance/drugs/vitamin_e
Aside from all of the above, the prospect of a significant reduction in vision would likely have had me following the same path you have been on.
Wishing you a positive outcome on all of this,
Bill
Connect

@diverjer
Yes, I suggested that solution for you - that is the easiest and simplest way.
I really , really doubt that you will find any doctor that will actually know the answer to your questions or would find time to do real deep dive into this "problem", so the best way forward is to find supplement that you feel comfortable with and that will not "scare you".
Also, as I said before, most of the vitamins are pooped and peed out so perhaps you were not even exposed to those doses and your doctors TOLD you to take them so really, how and why do you think you are to blame for anything ? As everybody else already said - cancer happens - it is mutation and mutations happen in many ways. For PC, age is the biggest factor.
Just stop taking that supplement and find the one that does not make you nervous and that is it 👍😎.