Connect← Return to Discouraging MRI Report
Discussion
Prostate Cancer | Last Active: Sep 26 2:35pm | Replies (61)
Comment receiving replies
@copyman appreciate the response. I would prefer a transperineal but I also don’t want to wait months. If my urologist offers a MRI fusion transrectal sooner I will probably go with that.
Replies to "@copyman appreciate the response. I would prefer a transperineal but I also don’t want to wait..."
Connect
@ezupcic Hi, I have similar pathology to what you have. My MRI shows 2 lesions; 1.0 and 1.9. The pathology from the MRI is interpretation from the imaging, which means a post fusion biopsy may change the actual results to be the same, or go up or go down. I went from 3+3 a year ago (active monitoring) to post MRI fusion biopsy which confirmed a lot. Gleason now 3+4 with some evidence of cribriform. My RO said he would do SBRT without ADT, and if recurrence occurs, he would do brachytherapy with some ADT. I am seeing my robotics surgeon tomorrow to make my final treatment decision. You will know much more after a fusion biopsy. Best of luck...