← Return to Thoughts on treatment options?

Discussion
jmgpdx68 avatar

Thoughts on treatment options?

Prostate Cancer | Last Active: 3 hours ago | Replies (113)

Comment receiving replies
Profile picture for wheel1 @wheel1

@ireland1964
Totally agree it must begin at bladder neck. I think the non cutting of the Puboprostatic ligament is significant to the reattachment of the urethra to the bladder neck and the remarkable quicker continence success with Retzius sparing. It just seems that knowing that now, I feel having learned it through these studies does not change the inability of a regular RALP having cut the ligament to protect the bladder neck. Since incontinence is one of the major concerns of patients, I would still want the best odds which are extremely high for fairly immediate continence with the Retzius sparing then possibly months and months up to a year for regular RALP to catch up without all the therapy, pads, kegels. Good luck but don’t rule out finding a surgeon that does it. I know Colleen published several studies on the Retzius sparing success with also quicker surgery recovery and ed recovery. I think she mentioned MAYO did it, which I think is close to you. It is possible their could be other factors that make it more likely to be successful, like a smaller prostate or not being obese. I have no idea about that.

Jump to this post


Replies to "@ireland1964 Totally agree it must begin at bladder neck. I think the non cutting of the..."

@wheel1 A quicker recovery for continence is a bonus for sure.
The article discussed how tumor location can play a factor in Retzius which uses the more complex posterior pathway and can therefore limit anterior access. So what’s your thoughts when MRI shows tumor to be anterior lateral?

God help me if my new search now involves finding a surgeon who utilizes the “Hood technique”

The hood technique, developed by Tewari et al., reinforces this perspective.9 By preserving the detrusor apron, puboprostatic ligaments, and arcus tendineus using an anterior approach, the technique replicates the structural advantages of Retzius-sparing surgery while avoiding the technical complexity of a posterior dissection. In their single-surgeon series, 88% of patients were pad-free by 6 weeks, with a low (6%) positive margin.9 These results support the notion that targeted anatomical preservation, rather than the route of access alone, drives improved continence.