← Return to PSA "undetectable" for amost a year: Continue to monitor

Discussion
Comment receiving replies
Profile picture for jc76 @jc76

@soli
When I got my original diagnosis and treatment options they came from Urologist and R/O. My Mayo PCP said he is doing a lot of research and wanted me to consider a second opinion to help me decide for myself. I did get a second opinion. The second opinion doctors there agreed with Mayo but wanted more testing and ordered them to make a final treatment recommendation.

I then met with my PCP and we went over both opinions and went over my doctors research to come to a conclusion of what is best for me. Each time I meet with my PCP he goes over research he does ongoing about P.C.. Why because he said I want to be able to consult with my P.C. patients on the latest research being done so can be an asset to them.

I researched on my own questions and doubts or needed more information myself and then would bring to my doctors opinions on my research. So for me specifically I did not rely on blindly relying on a single doctor or imply to blindly follow.

My comment on using the medical profession was not referencing doctors but to not get your medical guidance from MCC of for diagnosis, treatments,, etc. Mayo Community Connect is to provide your specific journey with P.C. and any other forum yo uare on.

Not to tell someone which test to take, a diagnosis, prognosis, treatment. What I do is limit my suggestions and reference to test, treatments and and issues to my own personal experience not to give medical advise to others.

Getting into diagnosing a patient, suggest treatments, prognosis, should come from medical doctors. If you do research it also should come from medical experts and professionals in the field your are researching. But that research is usually statistics not your specific case, your specific body, and your specific medical and mental health history.

The policies on MCC are to share your experiences not give medical advise. That was my goal of my post. Doing your own research is great as I have done it all along. It allowed me to question of my medical doctors. etc.

Many times I read someone suggesting take this or that supplement or a drug you can get from here or there. That can really cause issues with someone as we are all different, different ages, taking different supplements, different medications.

I would ask medical doctors who have my full medical and mental health history, along with all my medications and supplements I am on who can say if a supplement is oky to take based on me the individual not a study. I asked about a supplement from ICD/Pacemaker group saying they take potassium and really helps with PVCs.

I then checked with my doctors about the discussion on MCC about potasium and they said your blood test already shows you are at the upper limits of potassium already and do not recommend you take it.

I asked about a Covid medication was told you can't take that as it contradicts your heart failure medication. Thus my stance on only your medical doctors know your full medical and mental health history.

I for one have great doctors at both UFHPTI and Mayo. My PCP is outstanding. I say to him you are spending to much time with me. His answer is no I am here for you. I am here to ensure you can asked anything concerning you health and I take the time to explain or suggest.

I guess just like we are all different in our bodies and response to disease and medicines, we also have different relationships with your with your doctors.

I saw an outstanding R/O and urologist at Mayo for my P.C. It was my Mayo PCP suggested a second opinion for my mental health and decision making.

UFHPTI gave a complete information hand out about their facility (over 20 years doing proton radiation), tons of research on prostate cancer diagnosis and treatments, and the two books every one talks about including the Walsh book to read and then come back with questions. I recommend to others with P.C. not to go there because I did but to asked for the free information and books they will send you on prostate cancer and fed ex it over night.

Blindly follow, not me, but use the medical profession for medical advice, yes. And then second opinions and my own research to discuss with those medical professionals who are the experts in their field. And if not happy with my doctors I will change my doctors.

Just gave some information to other forum posters about Jardiance for heart failure. Not to take it but why I was taking it based on the research that showed it was beneficial for heart failure.

I contacted my heart failure specialist who mentioned the research and thus was putting me on. He provide the exact studies and web sites to go on to research it myself. I passed that along to the person who was asking about my HF doctors research. What they said and I totally agree is it statistics and does not guarantee that all will have a benefit from it.

Jump to this post


Replies to "@soli When I got my original diagnosis and treatment options they came from Urologist and R/O...."

@jc76 Certainly, nothing you read here is a substitute for the advice of your doctors. This is about sharing your own story, which may well be entirely unique to you.

But it is true that if you read the literature and talk to experts there are many different opinions. In my case, I had a biopsy in 2023 that showed a single positive core with Gleason 6. My urologist felt this was a case for active surveillance, which I agreed with, based on my reading in the literature (I am a PhD biochemist/immunologist). Nevertheless, my PSA kept rising. At my next biopsy in 2025, they found 3 positive cores, one Gleason 8 and one Gleason 4+3. Quite a change! This obviously required action.

I immediately made contact with a Center of Excellence in New York City. Our hospital here is a good academic medical center, but not a COE for cancer. They were ready to do surgery, but before my scheduled date I had an appointment with my Urologist here. He insisted that a PSMA-PET scan was necessary before deciding on surgery.

While I had no objection to having a scan, they scheduled it for a month away. Then I would have had to wait for a follow-up appointment, then wait for surgery. I felt that time was of the essence, as having an aggressive tumor sitting there as a potential source of metastasis did not appeal.

The folks in NYC saw no reason to do a pre-operative PET scan. That made sense to me and I went down for the operation. More than a year later, my PSA is undetectable, <0.02. This makes it very unlikely that the PET scan would have shown anything beyond the primary site.

So, doctors can disagree and we as patients have to make the choice we feel is best for us.