← Return to Biopsy vs Surgery Results

Discussion
ireland1964 avatar

Biopsy vs Surgery Results

Prostate Cancer | Last Active: Aug 29 9:17pm | Replies (44)

Comment receiving replies
Profile picture for fritzo @fritzo

@ireland1964 Yes, of course! My post-surgery pathology report results were exactly the same as my biopsy results, which in my book was good news. Pre-surgery, I had been told that my staging likely could go up because the location of my tumor was hard to sample via a transrectal biopsy (I didn't initially have the option of a transpereneal biopsy at my first doctor...midway through, I switched surgeons to a major center rather than local hospital).

I started out as 3+4=7 and ended in that same place. When I asked the surgeon about my post-surgery pathology report, he told me that it is as good as it gets.

Still, I get very anxious and nothing is a sure thing. Hoping that time lets this anxiety fade....

•••••••••••••••••

Here is the condensed post-surgical report:
Final Diagnosis

A. Anterior fat pad, excision:
• One lymph node and mature adipose tissue, negative for carcinoma.

B. Prostate, radical prostatectomy:
• Prostatic adenocarcinoma
• Gleason score 3+4=7 (Grade group 2, with 30% Gleason 4 tumor).
• Tumor is on the left as a 1.2 cm dominant nodule.
• Tumor involving 2% of prostate tissue examined.
• Tumor is organ-confined.
• Both seminal vesicles are negative for carcinoma.
• All surgical margins are negative for carcinoma.
• Benign prostatic hyperplasia, weighing 66.9 grams (including carcinoma).

Jump to this post


Replies to "@ireland1964 Yes, of course! My post-surgery pathology report results were exactly the same as my biopsy..."

@fritzo
Definitely good results from the biopsy.

It sounds like you’re going to be one of the people that doesn’t need to come back here, because nothing ever comes back. You had a very minor case of prostate cancer that got caught early.