← Return to Half of Prostate Cancer Focal Therapy Cases Were Inappropriate

Discussion
Comment receiving replies
Profile picture for northoftheborder @northoftheborder

@swl1956 @surftohealth88 Just so. I believe a micrometastasis needs to reach millions of cells before even PSMA-PET can detect it. And for that matter, needle biopsies are almost literally needles in haystacks — if they tell you that your Gleason score is 4+3 for example, that's just the highest they found in their samples. They might have narrowly missed a spot with Gleason 8 or 9 too small to register on the MRI.

There is no way at all to know for sure what's happening with prostate cancer. We're just taking samples, making scans, and playing odds.

That's why I (personally) have been happy to err a bit on the side of overtreatment, to tilt the odds more in my favour with stage 4 PCa: I'd rather live *with* some uncomfortable side-effects than die *without* them. YMMV.

Jump to this post


Replies to "@swl1956 @surftohealth88 Just so. I believe a micrometastasis needs to reach millions of cells before even..."

@northoftheborder

Agreed 100 % ! Biopsy samples just 1% of the gland and scans can not see it all.

I would also always choose more thorough and more aggressive path but my hubby would not *sigh so I had to really balance all of the decisions and present options to him with "walking on eggshells" dexterity : ((.
It was very challenging at times ... Even with BCR and deciding about groin node RT (yes or no). Luckily we had second opinion with UCLA top RO who said "do it" so I could exhale somewhat. Between Drs and him I am really feeling often like Gumby (character) ... Even doctors were nonchalant regardless of his highly aggressive cancer : ((( So it was me pulling on one side and doctors and him on the other .