← Return to Radiation vs Surgery Gleason 3+4=7, Long Term Side Effects (Cyclist)

Discussion
Comment receiving replies
Profile picture for tbp64msncom @tbp64msncom

I was Gleason 9 with 90% involvement and bladder neck invasion. I chose RALP because both opinions said I would probably have to do radiation and Lupron also, which I did. This is a 3 year process that I don't wish on anybody. Every situation is different but my understanding is that surgery is recommended for Gleason 7 and above especially with a higher % involvement (larger tumor) and either bladder neck invasion or para neural invasion. I wish you well!

Jump to this post


Replies to "I was Gleason 9 with 90% involvement and bladder neck invasion. I chose RALP because both..."

@tbp64msncom I had the same Gleason score, PSA 4.6 at 64yo. Opted for brachytherapy followed by IRMT in 2020. Long term side effects negligible. Urinary burning for nearly a year after treatments. Pleased with the treatment result. PSA 0.09 five years out. Wish you the best.