I considered PAE 2 years ago but ended up deciding against it. In hind sight, I made the right choice.
PAE works by eliminating the blood supply, the gland shrinks (atropy) over several weeks and decompresses the urethra.
During the procedure, millions of microscopic beads (embolic agents) are injected into these blood vessels, permanently cutting off the nutrient and blood supply to the hyperplastic prostate tissue.
Tissue removed : ~25% to 40% reduction via volume atrophy; 10 year durability as prosate revascularises and regrows.
Tissue removed (eg Holep): ~50% to 80%+ of the central tissue is cleared; a permanent life-long fix.
Because BPH is a progressive, hormonally driven condition, any tissue left behind will continue to grow over time. As PAE only shrinks the tissue rather than remove it, the prostate will sprout new blood vessels (revascularise) and cause symptoms to return years "in a few years time" necessiting another prostate reduction procedure.
UPSIDE: unlikely retrograde ejaculation as bladder neck muscle is spared which means there is tissue left behind to keep growing.
DOWNSIDE: Expect blockages in week one. Pack a small bag you can take with you to ER in case of emergency.
@heath2026 It seems that leaving 20 to 50 percent of prostate tissue behind with HoLEP would allow regrowth to happen within ten years.
For me the main upside of PAE is not having to deal with incontinence during the healing time. I was not ready for leakage for up to a year. Also it buys me time to consider HoLEP or Aquablation.
I’m on day six and have had no blockages. Knock on wood.
RE was not a consideration for me. I’ve been on tamsulosin for so long that it has already been happening for quite a few years.
I’m guessing that you had a very good experience with HoLEP. I am glad you did. I was not positive I would get the same.